The notion of scientific authority in the publishing of research: evolution of forms, changes of authority?

Lise Verlaet, Alain Chante
{"title":"The notion of scientific authority in the publishing of research: evolution of forms, changes of authority?","authors":"Lise Verlaet, Alain Chante","doi":"10.24069/2542-0267-2020-3-4-197-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Some practices of scientific text creation were known since 13 th century, however it is generally recognized that scientific book publishing started with invention of typography. That’s when scientists got the opportunity to make reference to printed media in order to back-up and build their research. Through centuries the authority belonged to academicians and members of scientific organizations consolidating professionals in information distribution, such as librarians and information search system operators. In the late 1900s economic dictate of large commercial publishing houses began to do more and more harm to science. Digital technologies development led many scientists to the Web where they headed network scientific publication projects intended to free the researchers from commercial editors’ yoke. Electronic devices use started the process of revision of scientific authority mechanisms, giving the authority back to those who make science. There is one step from open access to open science and prospects of renewed authority: collective and cooperation based.","PeriodicalId":256387,"journal":{"name":"Science Editor and Publisher","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Editor and Publisher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2020-3-4-197-210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Some practices of scientific text creation were known since 13 th century, however it is generally recognized that scientific book publishing started with invention of typography. That’s when scientists got the opportunity to make reference to printed media in order to back-up and build their research. Through centuries the authority belonged to academicians and members of scientific organizations consolidating professionals in information distribution, such as librarians and information search system operators. In the late 1900s economic dictate of large commercial publishing houses began to do more and more harm to science. Digital technologies development led many scientists to the Web where they headed network scientific publication projects intended to free the researchers from commercial editors’ yoke. Electronic devices use started the process of revision of scientific authority mechanisms, giving the authority back to those who make science. There is one step from open access to open science and prospects of renewed authority: collective and cooperation based.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究成果发表中的科学权威概念:形式的演变,权威的变化?
字体自13世纪以来,人们就知道了一些科学文本创作的做法,但人们普遍认为,科学图书出版始于印刷术的发明。那时,科学家们有机会参考印刷媒体,以支持和建立他们的研究。几个世纪以来,权威属于院士和科学组织的成员,这些组织巩固了信息分发方面的专业人员,如图书管理员和信息搜索系统操作员。20世纪后期,大型商业出版社的经济支配开始对科学造成越来越大的危害。数字技术的发展使许多科学家转向了网络,在那里他们领导了旨在将研究人员从商业编辑的枷锁中解放出来的网络科学出版项目。电子设备的使用开启了科学权威机制的修正过程,将权威还给了科学的创造者。从开放获取到开放科学和重新权威的前景只有一步之遥:以集体和合作为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geopolitics and publication strategy. Is there a dependance? Metadata of articles in the field of agriculture: complications in translating from Russian into English Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group flowchart: Authorship & Contributorship – Pre-publication Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group flowchart: Scientific rigor – Unpublished data What do our trade journals publish?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1