The Acceptability of Telemedicine Cabins by the Students

Patricia Baudier, Chantal Ammi, G. Kondrateva
{"title":"The Acceptability of Telemedicine Cabins by the Students","authors":"Patricia Baudier, Chantal Ammi, G. Kondrateva","doi":"10.3917/JIE.PR1.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine solutions are invading our daily lives, raising a major issue concerning the personalization of remote consultation and trust in the physician's Competence, Integrity and Benevolence (Trusting Beliefs). The aim of this study is to extend the existing Technology-Acceptance-Model (TAM) using the concept of Trusting Beliefs and Perceived Personalization. To test the model, a quantitative approach using existing scales has been selected. A survey was administered to students from several French business schools and the sample of 158 students was analysed using a Partial Least Approach. Findings highlight the key role of Trusting Beliefs in Perceived-Personalization. While two of the three dimensions (Benevolence and Integrity) of Trusting Beliefs theory have no influence on the Intention-to-Use, Competence has a direct, positive and significant impact on Intention-to-Use a Telemedicine Cabin. The relationship between the variables of the TAM is validated, except for Perceived-Ease-of-Use, which does not impact the Intention-to-Use a Telemedicine cabin.","PeriodicalId":151329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation Economics & Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation Economics & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/JIE.PR1.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Telemedicine solutions are invading our daily lives, raising a major issue concerning the personalization of remote consultation and trust in the physician's Competence, Integrity and Benevolence (Trusting Beliefs). The aim of this study is to extend the existing Technology-Acceptance-Model (TAM) using the concept of Trusting Beliefs and Perceived Personalization. To test the model, a quantitative approach using existing scales has been selected. A survey was administered to students from several French business schools and the sample of 158 students was analysed using a Partial Least Approach. Findings highlight the key role of Trusting Beliefs in Perceived-Personalization. While two of the three dimensions (Benevolence and Integrity) of Trusting Beliefs theory have no influence on the Intention-to-Use, Competence has a direct, positive and significant impact on Intention-to-Use a Telemedicine Cabin. The relationship between the variables of the TAM is validated, except for Perceived-Ease-of-Use, which does not impact the Intention-to-Use a Telemedicine cabin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对远程医疗小屋的接受程度
远程医疗解决方案正在侵入我们的日常生活,提出了一个主要问题,即远程会诊的个性化以及对医生的能力、诚信和仁慈(信任信念)的信任。本研究的目的是利用信任信念和感知个性化的概念扩展现有的技术接受模型(TAM)。为了检验该模型,选择了使用现有量表的定量方法。我们对法国几所商学院的学生进行了一项调查,并使用偏最小法对158名学生的样本进行了分析。研究结果强调了信任信念在感知个性化中的关键作用。信任信念理论的三个维度中的两个维度(仁慈和正直)对远程医疗舱的使用意图没有影响,而胜任力对远程医疗舱的使用意图有直接、积极和显著的影响。TAM变量之间的关系得到了验证,除了感知易用性,它不会影响远程医疗舱的使用意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems The Impacts of Blockchain on Innovation Management: Sectoral Experiments Artificial Intelligence, Robots and Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries H. Kent Baker, Ehsan Nikbakht, Sean Stein Smith (2021), The Emerald Handbook of Blockchain for Business, Bingley, UK, Emerald Publishing Limited, 464 p. Factors Influencing Profitability in Eco-design: Lessons from European and Canadian Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1