A Cross Sectional Study for Assessment of the Pattern of Partial Edentulism in Various Municipalities of Kavre District

S. Basnyat, D. Prajapati, S. Mahanta
{"title":"A Cross Sectional Study for Assessment of the Pattern of Partial Edentulism in Various Municipalities of Kavre District","authors":"S. Basnyat, D. Prajapati, S. Mahanta","doi":"10.3126/jnprossoc.v6i1.58347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Partial edentulism refers to missing one or more natural teeth but not all. Classifying the partial edentulous arches is necessary as it helps in treatment planning, designing and recognition of prosthetic support for removable partial denture. The main aim of this study was to access patterns of partial edentulism among patients and determine its association with socio-demographic parameters.\nMethods: Patients from various municipalities of Kavre district were selected for the study. Total of 206 patients were selected. The study was divided into two part. Questionnaire related to demographic data and intraoral examination to evaluate the pattern of partial edentulism according to Kennedy's Classification and Applegate's rule. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between Socio-demographic variables and pattern of partial edentulism. Statistical evaluation will be done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0), the level of significance set at p-value <0.05.\nResult: The number of partially edentulous was less in the age group 20-30 years 38 (27.33%) and 45(28.48%) respectively, whereas, it was high in age group above 50 years 52 (37.41 %) and 57 (36.08 %) respectively. Kennedy's Class III was the most common type of partial edentulism in both maxillary arch 62 (48.82%) and mandibular arch 71 (46.71%) followed by Class I in both maxilla 31(24.41%) and 38(25%). The least common type of partial edentulism was found to be Class IV. Among the modifications Class III Modification I was the most prevalent condition in both maxillary 17 (27.42%) and mandibular arch 22 (30.9%).\nConclusion: The study showed that age had statistically significant association with different classes of partial edentulism in both maxillary and mandibular arches. Whereas, gender had no association with the patterns of partial edentulism.","PeriodicalId":247304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnprossoc.v6i1.58347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Partial edentulism refers to missing one or more natural teeth but not all. Classifying the partial edentulous arches is necessary as it helps in treatment planning, designing and recognition of prosthetic support for removable partial denture. The main aim of this study was to access patterns of partial edentulism among patients and determine its association with socio-demographic parameters. Methods: Patients from various municipalities of Kavre district were selected for the study. Total of 206 patients were selected. The study was divided into two part. Questionnaire related to demographic data and intraoral examination to evaluate the pattern of partial edentulism according to Kennedy's Classification and Applegate's rule. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between Socio-demographic variables and pattern of partial edentulism. Statistical evaluation will be done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0), the level of significance set at p-value <0.05. Result: The number of partially edentulous was less in the age group 20-30 years 38 (27.33%) and 45(28.48%) respectively, whereas, it was high in age group above 50 years 52 (37.41 %) and 57 (36.08 %) respectively. Kennedy's Class III was the most common type of partial edentulism in both maxillary arch 62 (48.82%) and mandibular arch 71 (46.71%) followed by Class I in both maxilla 31(24.41%) and 38(25%). The least common type of partial edentulism was found to be Class IV. Among the modifications Class III Modification I was the most prevalent condition in both maxillary 17 (27.42%) and mandibular arch 22 (30.9%). Conclusion: The study showed that age had statistically significant association with different classes of partial edentulism in both maxillary and mandibular arches. Whereas, gender had no association with the patterns of partial edentulism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kavre地区各市局部牙髓化格局的横断面研究
简介:部分缺牙是指缺一颗或多颗天然牙齿,但不是全部。对部分无牙弓进行分类,有助于对可摘局部义齿的治疗计划、设计和识别。本研究的主要目的是了解患者局部全牙化的模式,并确定其与社会人口统计学参数的关系。方法:选取Kavre地区各市的患者进行研究。共选取206例患者。本研究分为两部分。根据肯尼迪分类和阿普尔盖特规则,通过人口统计资料问卷和口腔内检查来评估部分全牙症的类型。采用卡方检验来确定社会人口统计学变量与部分全牙化模式之间的关系。统计评估将使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 20.0)进行,显著性水平设置为p值<0.05。结果:20 ~ 30岁年龄组部分无牙人数较少,分别为38例(27.33%)和45例(28.48%);50岁以上年龄组部分无牙人数较多,分别为52例(37.41%)和57例(36.08%)。上颌弓62(48.82%)和下颌弓71(46.71%)中Kennedy氏ⅲ类是最常见的部分无牙症类型,其次是上颌31(24.41%)和上颌38(25%)。IV类是最不常见的类型,III类是上颌17例(27.42%)和下颌骨22例(30.9%)最常见的类型。结论:年龄与上颌和下颌弓不同类型的部分全牙症有统计学意义。然而,性别与部分全牙发育模式无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Cross Sectional Study for Assessment of the Pattern of Partial Edentulism in Various Municipalities of Kavre District Prosthetic rehabilitation in the Posterior Mandible with Tissue Level Implant: A Case Report Cephalometric Assessment of Condylar Position among Individuals with Different Skeletal Malocclusion Patterns Increased Occlusal Vertical Dimension and Its Influence on Lip Position at Smile in Dentulous Adults Management of cleft palate in middle schooler: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1