Teaching styles used by teachers in special and integrated schools

Beata Rola
{"title":"Teaching styles used by teachers in special and integrated schools","authors":"Beata Rola","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0012.7275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School has a special role in developing social skills in students with mild intellectual disabilities. It is often the only place where important behaviors and competencies are shaped, and the teacher plays a key part in this process. In this paper, I analyzed teachers’ assessments of their teaching styles by comparing opinions of teachers in special middle schools and in integrated middle schools. These settings follow different educational paths and, consequently, different teaching styles might be used. In the study, I also took into consideration the location of settings (Warsaw and near Warsaw). I used the Teacher Behavior Questionnaire by Grzegorz Sędek (1995). It includes the following dimensions of teachers’ activities in class: encouraging curiosity and creativity, lack of control over the class, criticizing, pushing, demanding faithful reproduction, clarity of expression and movement, stimulating students’ initiative in class, visualization and concretization of the material, and reminding students of the need to learn.\nThe study covered 121 middle school teachers, including 56 teachers in special schools and 65 teachers in integrated schools. The majority of respondents were women (81%). Most of the teachers had 10 to 20 years of service (30%) and were appointed teachers (47%) or chartered teachers (47%). The frequency of behaviors was presented as a percentage analysis. I assumed that the 0–20% range means that the teachers declare that they never show a given behavior, the 21–40% range – that a given behavior is rarely displayed, the 41–60% range – that the teachers sometimes behave in a given way, and the 61–80% range reveals frequent behaviors. The results above 80% indicate a very high frequency of a given behavior.\n\n","PeriodicalId":371798,"journal":{"name":"Special School","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School has a special role in developing social skills in students with mild intellectual disabilities. It is often the only place where important behaviors and competencies are shaped, and the teacher plays a key part in this process. In this paper, I analyzed teachers’ assessments of their teaching styles by comparing opinions of teachers in special middle schools and in integrated middle schools. These settings follow different educational paths and, consequently, different teaching styles might be used. In the study, I also took into consideration the location of settings (Warsaw and near Warsaw). I used the Teacher Behavior Questionnaire by Grzegorz Sędek (1995). It includes the following dimensions of teachers’ activities in class: encouraging curiosity and creativity, lack of control over the class, criticizing, pushing, demanding faithful reproduction, clarity of expression and movement, stimulating students’ initiative in class, visualization and concretization of the material, and reminding students of the need to learn. The study covered 121 middle school teachers, including 56 teachers in special schools and 65 teachers in integrated schools. The majority of respondents were women (81%). Most of the teachers had 10 to 20 years of service (30%) and were appointed teachers (47%) or chartered teachers (47%). The frequency of behaviors was presented as a percentage analysis. I assumed that the 0–20% range means that the teachers declare that they never show a given behavior, the 21–40% range – that a given behavior is rarely displayed, the 41–60% range – that the teachers sometimes behave in a given way, and the 61–80% range reveals frequent behaviors. The results above 80% indicate a very high frequency of a given behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊学校和综合学校教师使用的教学方式
学校在培养轻度智障学生的社交技能方面起着特殊的作用。学校往往是塑造重要行为和能力的唯一场所,而教师在这个过程中起着关键作用。本文通过对比特殊中学教师和综合中学教师对教学风格的评价,分析了教师对教学风格的评价。这些设置遵循不同的教育路径,因此可能使用不同的教学风格。在研究中,我还考虑了设置的位置(华沙和华沙附近)。我使用了Grzegorz Sędek(1995)的教师行为问卷。它包括教师课堂活动的以下几个维度:鼓励好奇心和创造力,对课堂缺乏控制,批评,推动,要求忠实再现,表达和动作清晰,激发学生在课堂上的主动性,材料的可视化和具体化,提醒学生需要学习。研究对象为121名中学教师,其中特殊学校教师56名,综合学校教师65名。大多数受访者是女性(81%)。大部分教师的工龄为10至20年(30%),为委任教师(47%)或特许教师(47%)。行为频率以百分比分析的形式呈现。我假设0-20%的范围意味着教师声称他们从未表现出某种特定的行为,21-40%的范围-某种特定的行为很少表现出来,41-60%的范围-教师有时会以某种特定的方式行事,61-80%的范围显示了频繁的行为。高于80%的结果表明给定行为的频率非常高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School difficulties of a visually impaired child with Foetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS). Case study Skills necessary to conduct a competent conversation with the ward in social rehabilitation work Are Immature Neuromotor Skills Significant Factors in Educational Under-achievement and Special Educational Needs? Literature review of the role of Primitive Reflexes as Indicators and Measures of Neuromotor Immaturity Maria Grzegorzewska's indications from 1918 on special education.Origins and activity of the State Institute for Special Pedagogics (19221976) Agnieszka Duniewska: Understanding literary texts by students with hearing impairment. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, Krakw 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1