Direct comparison of statistical damage frequency method and raster scan procedure

G. Batavičiūtė, M. Ščiuka, V. Plerpaitė, A. Melninkaitis
{"title":"Direct comparison of statistical damage frequency method and raster scan procedure","authors":"G. Batavičiūtė, M. Ščiuka, V. Plerpaitė, A. Melninkaitis","doi":"10.1117/12.2195332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presented study addresses the nano-size defects acting as damage precursors in nanosecond laser pulse irradiation regime. Defects embedded within the surface of glass are investigated in terms of defect ensembles. Damage frequency method and raster scan procedure are directly compared on the set of two samples: uncoated fused silica substrates and SiO2 monolayer films. The extracted defect ensembles appear to be different from each other. The limitations of compared methods such as pulse-to-pulse variation of laser intensity and sample contamination induced by laser ablation were identified as the main causes of observed differences.","PeriodicalId":204978,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Laser Damage","volume":"373 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2195332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presented study addresses the nano-size defects acting as damage precursors in nanosecond laser pulse irradiation regime. Defects embedded within the surface of glass are investigated in terms of defect ensembles. Damage frequency method and raster scan procedure are directly compared on the set of two samples: uncoated fused silica substrates and SiO2 monolayer films. The extracted defect ensembles appear to be different from each other. The limitations of compared methods such as pulse-to-pulse variation of laser intensity and sample contamination induced by laser ablation were identified as the main causes of observed differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接比较统计损伤频率法和光栅扫描程序
研究了在纳秒激光脉冲辐照下,纳米缺陷作为损伤前体的问题。从缺陷集成的角度研究了玻璃表面内嵌缺陷。在未涂覆熔融二氧化硅基片和SiO2单层膜两组样品上,直接比较了损伤频率法和光栅扫描法。所提取的缺陷集合似乎彼此不同。对比方法的局限性,如脉冲间激光强度的变化和激光烧蚀引起的样品污染,被认为是观察到差异的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of particle shape on the laser-contaminant interaction induced damage on the protective capping layer of 1ω high reflector mirror coatings Direct comparison of statistical damage frequency method and raster scan procedure Refined metrology of spatio-temporal dynamics of nanosecond laser pulses Characterization of damage precursor density from laser damage probability measurements with non-Gaussian beams Direct absorption measurements in thin rods and optical fibers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1