LTE and hybrid sensor-LTE network performances in smart grid demand response scenarios

Juho Markkula, J. Haapola
{"title":"LTE and hybrid sensor-LTE network performances in smart grid demand response scenarios","authors":"Juho Markkula, J. Haapola","doi":"10.1109/SmartGridComm.2013.6687955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper conducts an evaluation of traffic volumes, delivery ratios, and delays under various demand response (DR) setups using two distinct wireless solutions for smart grid (SG) communications. The first solution considers public long term evolution (LTE) network and the second one considers cluster-based hybrid sensor-LTE network where wireless sensor network (WSN) clusterheads are also equipped with LTE remote terminal units. The DR scenarios reflect cases where certain percentages of end users take part in automated DR-based load balancing while the rest of the users resort to advanced metering infrastructure based energy monitoring. In the DR cases various setups of energy consumption monitoring and load-balancing feedback are simulated. The purpose is to identify the limits of reporting and feedback intervals of the two communications technology setups for DR operations. DR and its management are becoming more important as distributed energy generation becomes more popular in households due to reducing prices of small-scale renewable energy generation equipment. The use of public telecommunications infrastructure is a good candidate for enabling DR communications over SGs, but it is becoming more congested by the increasing mobile data usage of consumers. The results show that both of the solutions have their advantages, LTE communications generally providing a higher delivery ratio whereas, surprisingly, hybrid sensor-LTE communications generally provides lower uplink delay.","PeriodicalId":136434,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartGridComm.2013.6687955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The paper conducts an evaluation of traffic volumes, delivery ratios, and delays under various demand response (DR) setups using two distinct wireless solutions for smart grid (SG) communications. The first solution considers public long term evolution (LTE) network and the second one considers cluster-based hybrid sensor-LTE network where wireless sensor network (WSN) clusterheads are also equipped with LTE remote terminal units. The DR scenarios reflect cases where certain percentages of end users take part in automated DR-based load balancing while the rest of the users resort to advanced metering infrastructure based energy monitoring. In the DR cases various setups of energy consumption monitoring and load-balancing feedback are simulated. The purpose is to identify the limits of reporting and feedback intervals of the two communications technology setups for DR operations. DR and its management are becoming more important as distributed energy generation becomes more popular in households due to reducing prices of small-scale renewable energy generation equipment. The use of public telecommunications infrastructure is a good candidate for enabling DR communications over SGs, but it is becoming more congested by the increasing mobile data usage of consumers. The results show that both of the solutions have their advantages, LTE communications generally providing a higher delivery ratio whereas, surprisingly, hybrid sensor-LTE communications generally provides lower uplink delay.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能电网需求响应场景下的LTE和混合传感器-LTE网络性能
本文使用智能电网(SG)通信的两种不同的无线解决方案,对各种需求响应(DR)设置下的交通量、交付率和延迟进行了评估。第一种方案考虑公共长期演进(LTE)网络,第二种方案考虑基于集群的传感器-LTE混合网络,其中无线传感器网络(WSN)集群头也配备LTE远程终端单元。容灾场景反映了这样的情况:一定比例的最终用户参与了基于容灾的自动化负载平衡,而其余用户则求助于基于高级计量基础设施的能源监控。在容灾情况下,模拟了各种能耗监测和负载均衡反馈的设置。目的是确定DR操作的两种通信技术设置的报告和反馈间隔的限制。由于小型可再生能源发电设备的价格下降,分布式发电在家庭中越来越受欢迎,因此DR及其管理变得越来越重要。公共电信基础设施的使用是通过SGs实现DR通信的一个很好的选择,但是由于消费者移动数据使用量的增加,它变得越来越拥挤。结果表明,这两种解决方案都有其优势,LTE通信通常提供更高的传输比,而令人惊讶的是,混合传感器-LTE通信通常提供更低的上行延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On measurement unit placement for smart electrical grid fault localization Delay makes a difference: Smart grid resilience under remote meter disconnect attack Online energy management strategies for base stations powered by the smart grid On phasor measurement unit placement against state and topology attacks The development of a smart grid co-simulation platform and case study on Vehicle-to-Grid voltage support application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1