The Perception of the EU Legal Order in International Law: An In- and Outside View

C. Binder, Jane A. Hofbauer
{"title":"The Perception of the EU Legal Order in International Law: An In- and Outside View","authors":"C. Binder, Jane A. Hofbauer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3098788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU is a strange phenomenon, whether regarded from the perspective of international or domestic law. It evokes many questions on the relationship of its legal order with international law and domestic law, respectively. Despite the increasing trend by the CJEU to emphasize the EU’s autonomy—both, internally and externally—, from an international law perspective, there is no reason to per se “detach” the EU from the international legal framework. This is in part also evident in how international dispute settlement bodies address questions touching upon the EU legal order and its relation to international law. This contribution focuses on the nature of the EU legal order as designated by international dispute settlement bodies, and particularly its relationship with the international legal order. On the basis of examples from four different fields—general international law, trade law, human rights law and investment law—, theoretical, jurisdictional and substantive reconciliatory techniques are identified. In particular, it is shown that the classification of the EU legal order as a subsystem of international law, as a de facto domestic order or as a sui generis legal order predetermines which conflict rules and reconciliatory techniques find application.","PeriodicalId":371849,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Jurisdictional Issues (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Jurisdictional Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The EU is a strange phenomenon, whether regarded from the perspective of international or domestic law. It evokes many questions on the relationship of its legal order with international law and domestic law, respectively. Despite the increasing trend by the CJEU to emphasize the EU’s autonomy—both, internally and externally—, from an international law perspective, there is no reason to per se “detach” the EU from the international legal framework. This is in part also evident in how international dispute settlement bodies address questions touching upon the EU legal order and its relation to international law. This contribution focuses on the nature of the EU legal order as designated by international dispute settlement bodies, and particularly its relationship with the international legal order. On the basis of examples from four different fields—general international law, trade law, human rights law and investment law—, theoretical, jurisdictional and substantive reconciliatory techniques are identified. In particular, it is shown that the classification of the EU legal order as a subsystem of international law, as a de facto domestic order or as a sui generis legal order predetermines which conflict rules and reconciliatory techniques find application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际法对欧盟法律秩序的观照:内外观
无论从国际法还是国内法的角度来看,欧盟都是一个奇怪的现象。它分别就其法律秩序与国际法和国内法的关系提出了许多问题。尽管欧洲法院越来越强调欧盟在内部和外部的自主性,但从国际法的角度来看,没有理由将欧盟从国际法框架中“分离”出来。这在国际争端解决机构如何处理涉及欧盟法律秩序及其与国际法的关系的问题上也有部分体现。这篇文章的重点是国际争端解决机构指定的欧盟法律秩序的性质,特别是它与国际法律秩序的关系。根据一般国际法、贸易法、人权法和投资法四个不同领域的例子,确定了理论、管辖和实质性和解技术。本文特别指出,将欧盟法律秩序分类为国际法的一个子系统、事实上的国内秩序或自成一体的法律秩序,预先决定了适用哪些冲突规则和和解技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Monetary Gold Principle and the Member States Responsibility The Perception of the EU Legal Order in International Law: An In- and Outside View Hungarian Cases Before ICSID Tribunals: The Hungarian Experience with Investment Arbitration International Space Law Differing Perceptions? Market Practice and the Evolution of Foreign Sovereign Immunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1