Automating relative debugging

Aaron Searle, J. Gough, D. Abramson
{"title":"Automating relative debugging","authors":"Aaron Searle, J. Gough, D. Abramson","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2003.1240337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creation of a new program version based on an existing version is known as software evolution. In 1994, Abramson and Sosic proposed relative debugging to assist users to locate errors in programs developed with software evolutionary techniques. Relative debugging is a paradigm described by D. Abramson et al. (1996) that enables programmers to locate errors by comparing the developed (evolved) program with the original (existing) program as they are concurrently executed. The aim of the proposed research is to further enhance the currently defined paradigm by (partially or completely) automating the process of relatively debugging. We investigate the possibility of automatically identifying the data structures and program points, normally performed by the user, where values should be equivalent during program execution. Minimizing the user's involvement will reduce the cost of enhancing, maintaining and porting software, and has the potential to provide significant productivity gains on current practices in software development.","PeriodicalId":114604,"journal":{"name":"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2003.1240337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The creation of a new program version based on an existing version is known as software evolution. In 1994, Abramson and Sosic proposed relative debugging to assist users to locate errors in programs developed with software evolutionary techniques. Relative debugging is a paradigm described by D. Abramson et al. (1996) that enables programmers to locate errors by comparing the developed (evolved) program with the original (existing) program as they are concurrently executed. The aim of the proposed research is to further enhance the currently defined paradigm by (partially or completely) automating the process of relatively debugging. We investigate the possibility of automatically identifying the data structures and program points, normally performed by the user, where values should be equivalent during program execution. Minimizing the user's involvement will reduce the cost of enhancing, maintaining and porting software, and has the potential to provide significant productivity gains on current practices in software development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动化相对调试
在现有版本的基础上创造新的程序版本被称为软件进化。1994年,Abramson和Sosic提出了相对调试,以帮助用户定位使用软件进化技术开发的程序中的错误。相对调试是D. Abramson等人(1996)描述的一种范式,它使程序员能够在并发执行时,通过将开发(进化)的程序与原始(现有)程序进行比较来定位错误。所提出的研究的目的是通过(部分或完全)自动化相对调试过程来进一步增强当前定义的范式。我们研究了自动识别数据结构和程序点的可能性,通常由用户执行,其中的值在程序执行期间应该是相等的。最小化用户的参与将减少增强、维护和移植软件的成本,并且有可能在软件开发的当前实践中提供显著的生产力收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual constraint diagrams: runtime conformance checking of UML object models versus implementations A model-driven approach to non-functional analysis of software architectures Overview of OpenModel-based validation with partial information Semi-automatic fault localization and behavior verification for physical system simulation models Automation for exception freedom proofs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1