Measuring the USLE soil erodibility factor in the unit plots of Sparacia (southern Italy) experimental area

V. Bagarello, V. Ferro, V. Pampalone
{"title":"Measuring the USLE soil erodibility factor in the unit plots of Sparacia (southern Italy) experimental area","authors":"V. Bagarello, V. Ferro, V. Pampalone","doi":"10.1109/MetroAgriFor55389.2022.9964826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is still widely used to predict soil loss by water erosion and to establish soil conservation measures. In this model, the soil erodibility factor $K$ accounts for the susceptibility of the soil to be eroded due to the detachment and transport processes operated by the erosive agents. According to the USLE scheme, the $K$ factor should be measured on unit plots, i.e., bare plots of given length (22 m) and steepness (9%) tilled along the maximum slope direction, but there is little evidence that there ever existed an actual unit plot between the plots used to develop the USLE. Given the difficulty in collecting sufficient data to adequately measure $K$., the nomograph method was early developed to allow estimation of $K$ based on standard soil properties. First, in this investigation the soil erodibility factor was experimentally determined for the clay soil of the Sparacia (Sicily) experimental station, based on the available measurements collected in two unit plots. Although a limited database was available for this analysis, a very low value (0.0038 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1) was determined, which was an order of magnitude lower than the nomograph value. Then, the values of the plot steepness factor $S$ were determined using soil loss measurements collected on plots varying in steepness from 9 to 26% and resulted higher than the estimated values by a well-known literature expression. Finally, the plot length factor $L$ resulted independent of the plot length and equal to one. The former result was explained by the different flow transport capacity in the unit plot and plot with increased steepness, while the result of a constant length factor was supported by other experimental investigations.","PeriodicalId":374452,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAgriFor55389.2022.9964826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is still widely used to predict soil loss by water erosion and to establish soil conservation measures. In this model, the soil erodibility factor $K$ accounts for the susceptibility of the soil to be eroded due to the detachment and transport processes operated by the erosive agents. According to the USLE scheme, the $K$ factor should be measured on unit plots, i.e., bare plots of given length (22 m) and steepness (9%) tilled along the maximum slope direction, but there is little evidence that there ever existed an actual unit plot between the plots used to develop the USLE. Given the difficulty in collecting sufficient data to adequately measure $K$., the nomograph method was early developed to allow estimation of $K$ based on standard soil properties. First, in this investigation the soil erodibility factor was experimentally determined for the clay soil of the Sparacia (Sicily) experimental station, based on the available measurements collected in two unit plots. Although a limited database was available for this analysis, a very low value (0.0038 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1) was determined, which was an order of magnitude lower than the nomograph value. Then, the values of the plot steepness factor $S$ were determined using soil loss measurements collected on plots varying in steepness from 9 to 26% and resulted higher than the estimated values by a well-known literature expression. Finally, the plot length factor $L$ resulted independent of the plot length and equal to one. The former result was explained by the different flow transport capacity in the unit plot and plot with increased steepness, while the result of a constant length factor was supported by other experimental investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利南部Sparacia试验区单元样地USLE土壤可蚀性因子的测定
通用土壤流失方程(USLE)仍被广泛用于预测水土流失和制定水土保持措施。在该模型中,土壤可蚀性因子K反映了土壤在侵蚀剂作用下的分离和运移过程对侵蚀的敏感性。根据USLE方案,$K$因子应在单元地块上测量,即沿最大坡度方向耕作的给定长度(22 m)和坡度(9%)的裸地块,但几乎没有证据表明用于开发USLE的地块之间存在实际的单元地块。鉴于难以收集足够的数据来充分衡量$K$。在美国,nomograph方法很早就被开发出来,允许基于标准土壤性质来估计$K$。首先,在本研究中,基于在两个单元样地收集的可用测量数据,实验确定了Sparacia (Sicily)实验站粘土的土壤可蚀性因子。虽然可用于该分析的数据库有限,但确定了一个非常低的值(0.0038 tha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1),比nomograph值低一个数量级。然后,利用在坡度为9% ~ 26%的样地上收集的土壤流失量来确定样地陡峭系数S$的值,其结果高于一个著名的文献表达式的估计值。最后,小区长度因子$L$的结果与小区长度无关,等于1。前者的结果可以用单元地块和陡度增加地块的输流量不同来解释,而恒定长度因子的结果也得到了其他实验研究的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of dairy cattle slurry for biogas production and nitrogen recovery The efficiency of digestate as inoculum for in vitro digestibility of feeds Ion Mobility Spectrometry for Rapid HEMP Potency Testing - spectrometric testing of technical hemp A customizable and use friendly R package to process big data from the Tree Talker system Benefits of using production factors in assessing farm risk: a simulation on the role of irrigation data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1