Comparison of paper and automated fault isolation techniques

P. Bursch, J. Meisner
{"title":"Comparison of paper and automated fault isolation techniques","authors":"P. Bursch, J. Meisner","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.1992.270082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current flight line maintenance troubleshooting uses static fault isolation trees contained in paper based technical manuals. Future troubleshooting trends will automate the flight line diagnosis of system failures using portable maintenance aides (PMAs). The authors compare and contrast the future automated diagnostic approach to the paper based methodology of today. Field experiment results are also presented that quantify the differences between these two troubleshooting approaches. These field experiments conducted at Luke Air Force Base showed that enhanced maintenance performance was achieved when a diverse work force was equipped with PMAs.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":273287,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record AUTOTESTCON '92: The IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record AUTOTESTCON '92: The IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1992.270082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Current flight line maintenance troubleshooting uses static fault isolation trees contained in paper based technical manuals. Future troubleshooting trends will automate the flight line diagnosis of system failures using portable maintenance aides (PMAs). The authors compare and contrast the future automated diagnostic approach to the paper based methodology of today. Field experiment results are also presented that quantify the differences between these two troubleshooting approaches. These field experiments conducted at Luke Air Force Base showed that enhanced maintenance performance was achieved when a diverse work force was equipped with PMAs.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纸张与自动故障隔离技术的比较
目前的航线维护故障排除使用包含在纸质技术手册中的静态故障隔离树。未来的故障排除趋势将是使用便携式维护助手(pma)自动诊断系统故障。作者比较和对比了未来的自动诊断方法,以论文为基础的方法论的今天。现场实验结果也量化了这两种故障排除方法之间的差异。在卢克空军基地进行的这些现场实验表明,当多样化的工作队伍配备pma时,可以实现增强的维护性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advanced RF built in test TPS-X-an automated graphical approach to TPS design Applying diagnostic techniques to improve software quality An artificially intelligent-human interface for test/diagnosis Creating a concurrent engineering environment to enhance supportability of the F/A-18E/F aircraft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1