12. The Broken Mirror: The Identity of the Text in Shelley's Triumph of Life

{"title":"12. The Broken Mirror: The Identity of the Text in Shelley's Triumph of Life","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501723148-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Prometheus Unbound Shelley goes as far as he can in separating the pragmatic from the metaphysical, the positive activity of reading or more properly acting out, from what he sees as the deconstructive ac­ tivity of writing. But there is something evasive about this solution. De­ nying that reading can return us to a point of origin, the play neverthe­ less affirms that it can enact a work identical with itself. For in making his text into a play, Shelley allegorizes reading as performance rather than interpretation, a discourse that legitimizes itself by doing what it says rather than by conveying an anterior and provable truth . At the end of her encounter with Demogorgon, Asia gives up the attempt to inter­ pret anything and simply acts as if certain suppositions were true. We are not bound by these suppositions, since the fourth act is a masque that knows itself to be sustained only by Demogorgon's rough magic . 1 Yet if we stand back from the play, we begin to sense that Prometheus Unbound only represents a solution. For the notion of reading as performance ignores the fact that there is no such thing as an act of pure will unmedi­ ated by language. Or to put it differently , it avoids recognizing that performance also occurs in a linguistic world . Indeed, in one of the manuscript versions of the Defence Shelley sees perception or poetry, expression or art, and \"invention\" or \"the application of art\" to knowl­ edge and use, as gradations of the same power, thus implying that they","PeriodicalId":405532,"journal":{"name":"The Supplement of Reading","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Supplement of Reading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723148-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Prometheus Unbound Shelley goes as far as he can in separating the pragmatic from the metaphysical, the positive activity of reading or more properly acting out, from what he sees as the deconstructive ac­ tivity of writing. But there is something evasive about this solution. De­ nying that reading can return us to a point of origin, the play neverthe­ less affirms that it can enact a work identical with itself. For in making his text into a play, Shelley allegorizes reading as performance rather than interpretation, a discourse that legitimizes itself by doing what it says rather than by conveying an anterior and provable truth . At the end of her encounter with Demogorgon, Asia gives up the attempt to inter­ pret anything and simply acts as if certain suppositions were true. We are not bound by these suppositions, since the fourth act is a masque that knows itself to be sustained only by Demogorgon's rough magic . 1 Yet if we stand back from the play, we begin to sense that Prometheus Unbound only represents a solution. For the notion of reading as performance ignores the fact that there is no such thing as an act of pure will unmedi­ ated by language. Or to put it differently , it avoids recognizing that performance also occurs in a linguistic world . Indeed, in one of the manuscript versions of the Defence Shelley sees perception or poetry, expression or art, and "invention" or "the application of art" to knowl­ edge and use, as gradations of the same power, thus implying that they
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
12. 破碎的镜子:雪莱《生命的胜利》文本的身份
在《解放的普罗米修斯》中,雪莱尽可能地将实用主义与形而上学,积极的阅读活动,或者更恰当地说,从他所认为的解构主义的写作活动中分离出来。但这个解决方案有些闪烁其词。戏剧否认阅读可以使我们回到原点,但它仍然肯定它可以上演一部与自己相同的作品。因为在把他的文本变成戏剧的过程中,雪莱将阅读寓言化为一种表演,而不是解释,一种通过言出所言而不是通过传达一个预先的、可证明的真理来使自己合法化的话语。在她与德谟高尼翁相遇的最后,亚西亚放弃了解释任何事情的尝试,只是简单地表现出某些假设是正确的。我们不受这些假设的束缚,因为第四幕是一场假面戏,它知道自己只有靠德摩歌根粗暴的魔法才能维持下去。然而,如果我们不去看戏剧,我们就会开始感觉到,被解放的普罗米修斯只是代表了一种解决办法。因为将阅读视为表演的观念忽略了这样一个事实,即不存在没有语言介入的纯粹意志行为。或者换句话说,它避免认识到表演也发生在语言世界中。事实上,在《辩护》的一个手稿版本中,雪莱把感知或诗歌、表达或艺术,以及“发明”或“艺术应用”与知识和使用看作是同一力量的层次,从而暗示它们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
7. Untying Blake's Secular Scripture Afterword 12. The Broken Mirror: The Identity of the Text in Shelley's Triumph of Life 11. Deconstruction or Reconstruction: Reading Shelley's Prometheus Unbound Acknowledgments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1