On clarifying the quality control of software products

O. Tikhanychev
{"title":"On clarifying the quality control of software products","authors":"O. Tikhanychev","doi":"10.7256/2454-0714.2022.2.37985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the extensive volume of experience in the field of control automation, there are quite a lot of problems in the process of developing automated systems, including those related to the development of application software for them. With this in mind, the process of software development of automated control systems is chosen as the subject of research. The object of the study is a model of quality control of this process. Currently, legal regulation of software quality control is based on a paradigm that determines that the quality of programs will be checked exclusively for compliance with the requirements of the terms of contract. But, as practice has shown, such a paradigm does not fully meet modern conditions, providing not full-fledged quality control -- the verification of compliance of programs with customer expectations formulated at the stage of system design is needed. To find ways to solve the problem, the article uses general scientific methods of analysis. Based on the analysis of currently used methods and models of software testing, proposals for clarifying the paradigm of its evaluation and control are synthesized. The article formulates a scientific and practical problem and suggests a possible approach to its solution based on the refinement of the quality assessment paradigm currently used, on the transition from a \"rigid\", preset model to an expanded quality assessment model that takes into account not only the requirements of the terms of the contract, but also the conditions for their implementation. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in the fact that the solution of the formulated task will provide an overall improvement in the quality of control by improving the safety and effectiveness of programs based on the transition to the use of an extended dynamic testing model of the software being developed, implemented within the framework of a refined quality assessment paradigm","PeriodicalId":155484,"journal":{"name":"Программные системы и вычислительные методы","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Программные системы и вычислительные методы","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0714.2022.2.37985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the extensive volume of experience in the field of control automation, there are quite a lot of problems in the process of developing automated systems, including those related to the development of application software for them. With this in mind, the process of software development of automated control systems is chosen as the subject of research. The object of the study is a model of quality control of this process. Currently, legal regulation of software quality control is based on a paradigm that determines that the quality of programs will be checked exclusively for compliance with the requirements of the terms of contract. But, as practice has shown, such a paradigm does not fully meet modern conditions, providing not full-fledged quality control -- the verification of compliance of programs with customer expectations formulated at the stage of system design is needed. To find ways to solve the problem, the article uses general scientific methods of analysis. Based on the analysis of currently used methods and models of software testing, proposals for clarifying the paradigm of its evaluation and control are synthesized. The article formulates a scientific and practical problem and suggests a possible approach to its solution based on the refinement of the quality assessment paradigm currently used, on the transition from a "rigid", preset model to an expanded quality assessment model that takes into account not only the requirements of the terms of the contract, but also the conditions for their implementation. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in the fact that the solution of the formulated task will provide an overall improvement in the quality of control by improving the safety and effectiveness of programs based on the transition to the use of an extended dynamic testing model of the software being developed, implemented within the framework of a refined quality assessment paradigm
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论明确软件产品的质量控制
尽管在控制自动化领域有丰富的经验,但在开发自动化系统的过程中存在相当多的问题,包括与它们的应用软件开发有关的问题。有鉴于此,本文选择自动化控制系统的软件开发过程作为研究课题。本研究的对象是这一过程的质量控制模型。目前,软件质量控制的法律法规是基于一种范例的,这种范例决定了程序的质量将被专门检查以符合合同条款的要求。但是,正如实践所表明的那样,这样的范例并不能完全满足现代的条件,不能提供成熟的质量控制——在系统设计阶段制定的符合客户期望的程序的验证是需要的。为了找到解决问题的方法,本文运用了一般科学的分析方法。在分析当前常用的软件测试方法和模型的基础上,提出了明确软件测试评估和控制范式的建议。本文提出了一个具有科学性和实践性的问题,并在对目前使用的质量评估范式进行细化的基础上,提出了一种可能的解决方法,即从“刚性”的预设模型向扩展的质量评估模型过渡,该模型不仅考虑了合同条款的要求,而且考虑了合同条款的实施条件。所提出的方法的新颖之处在于,制定任务的解决方案将通过提高程序的安全性和有效性,从而全面改善控制质量,这是基于对正在开发的软件的扩展动态测试模型的使用的过渡,在一个精炼的质量评估范例的框架内实现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithm and software implementation of real-time collaborative editing of graphical schemes using Socket.IO library Integration of cloud, fog, and edge technologies for the optimization of high-load systems Development of an automated system for testing a cloud service for deploying virtual machines using modern monitoring tools Eye-tracking detection of the area of interest in data visualization Ambiguous Results when Using Parallel Class Methods within the .NET Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1