General Court: Further Clarification on SVHC Status of Bisphenol A

M. Ahlhaus, M. Öttinger
{"title":"General Court: Further Clarification on SVHC Status of Bisphenol A","authors":"M. Ahlhaus, M. Öttinger","doi":"10.21552/icrl/2019/3/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory efforts regarding Bisphenol A are subject to on-going discussions, including the underlying scientific assessment of the intrinsic properties of the substance and related risks. In this context, the businessassociationPlasticsEuropechallengedseveraldecisions relating to the inclusion of Bisphenol A in the list of substances qualifying as candidates for authorisation according to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH)1. Most recently the General Court has issued two rulings anddismissed the corresponding actions by PlasticsEurope. By upholding the underlying decisions regarding the initial inclusion of Bisphenol A in the candidate list aswell as a subsequently added justification to that inclusion, the General Court for the first time clarified essential details regarding the procedure and scientific requirements which have to be met to include substances in the candidate list.","PeriodicalId":375592,"journal":{"name":"International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/icrl/2019/3/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory efforts regarding Bisphenol A are subject to on-going discussions, including the underlying scientific assessment of the intrinsic properties of the substance and related risks. In this context, the businessassociationPlasticsEuropechallengedseveraldecisions relating to the inclusion of Bisphenol A in the list of substances qualifying as candidates for authorisation according to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH)1. Most recently the General Court has issued two rulings anddismissed the corresponding actions by PlasticsEurope. By upholding the underlying decisions regarding the initial inclusion of Bisphenol A in the candidate list aswell as a subsequently added justification to that inclusion, the General Court for the first time clarified essential details regarding the procedure and scientific requirements which have to be met to include substances in the candidate list.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通法院:进一步澄清双酚A的SVHC地位
有关双酚A的监管努力正在进行讨论,包括对该物质内在特性和相关风险的基本科学评估。在此背景下,欧洲塑料商业协会对根据法规(EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH)1将双酚A列入符合授权候选物质清单的几项决定提出质疑。最近,普通法院发布了两项裁决,驳回了欧洲塑料协会的相应诉讼。通过维持关于双酚A最初列入候选清单的基本决定以及随后增加的列入理由,普通法院首次澄清了有关将物质列入候选清单必须满足的程序和科学要求的基本细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
General Court: Further Clarification on SVHC Status of Bisphenol A Administrative Precedent and the Application of the REACH Regulation - 10 Years of the ECHA Board of Appeal The Authorisation Scheme for Biocidal Products in Switzerland The SCIP Database under Directive (EU) 2018/851 Legal Requirements of Korean Biocide Regulation (K-BPR) and Korean REACH (K-REACH)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1