An Empirical Analysis of Risk Factors in Aviation: Evidence from 1995-2016 NTSB Data

R. Herman, Rossitza B. Wooster
{"title":"An Empirical Analysis of Risk Factors in Aviation: Evidence from 1995-2016 NTSB Data","authors":"R. Herman, Rossitza B. Wooster","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2887620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the 20th Century, people endeavored into the skies for the first time. While this once audacious pursuit has become commonplace in 21st Century life, the safety of air travel has come at the expense of many aircraft accidents and incidents. Aviation safety analysis is traditionally retroactive, as new policies, procedures, practices, and regulation are driven by these accidents and incidents. The United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently advocating a more proactive approach to aviation safety wherein certain factors, whether they be environmental, mechanical, human, or some combination thereof are analyzed in order to identify the level of risk of an operation. The intent of this paper is to demonstrate two models by which risk analysis can be conducted using data that contains external factors and the outcome of the flight.","PeriodicalId":432405,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Science eJournal","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2887620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the beginning of the 20th Century, people endeavored into the skies for the first time. While this once audacious pursuit has become commonplace in 21st Century life, the safety of air travel has come at the expense of many aircraft accidents and incidents. Aviation safety analysis is traditionally retroactive, as new policies, procedures, practices, and regulation are driven by these accidents and incidents. The United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently advocating a more proactive approach to aviation safety wherein certain factors, whether they be environmental, mechanical, human, or some combination thereof are analyzed in order to identify the level of risk of an operation. The intent of this paper is to demonstrate two models by which risk analysis can be conducted using data that contains external factors and the outcome of the flight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空风险因素的实证分析——来自1995-2016年NTSB数据的证据
20世纪初,人们第一次尝试进入天空。虽然这种曾经大胆的追求在21世纪的生活中已经司空见惯,但航空旅行的安全是以许多飞机事故和事件为代价的。航空安全分析传统上具有追溯性,因为新的政策、程序、做法和法规是由这些事故和事件推动的。美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)目前正在倡导一种更积极主动的航空安全方法,其中分析某些因素,无论是环境,机械,人为还是其某些组合,以确定操作的风险水平。本文的目的是展示两种模型,通过这种模型,可以使用包含外部因素和飞行结果的数据进行风险分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In the Driver’s Seat: The Role of Transformational Leadership in Safe and Productive Truck Cargo Transport Smart Navigation via Strategic Communications in a Mixed Autonomous Paradigm Perception vs. Reality: The Aviation Noise Complaint Effect on Home Prices Airport Dominance, Route Network Design and Flight Delays Brazilian Railways Relations of Production Density, Scale, Scope and Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1