Numerical Simulation Studies on Stall Suppression of a NACA0015 Airfoil

Biswash Shrestha, Nawraj Bhattarai
{"title":"Numerical Simulation Studies on Stall Suppression of a NACA0015 Airfoil","authors":"Biswash Shrestha, Nawraj Bhattarai","doi":"10.3126/jacem.v6i0.38276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to achieve an improved airfoil performance at low Reynolds number, and to determine the optimum position and size of rectangular cross-section burst control plate (BCP) to suppress stall in airfoil. The type of airfoil used in the present study is NACA0015 (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) airfoil with 200 mm of chord (c) length. Here, rectangular cross-section burst control plates with different sizes and at different locations are investigated numerically at the low Reynolds number of 1.6×105. Total of three positions (0.05c, 0.1c and 0.2c from the leading edge of airfoil), and four sizes (with heights 0.3 mm, 0.7mm, 1mm and 1.5 mm, and constant width 4 mm) of rectangular BCPs are simulated in ANSYS Fluent software using Transition SST model. The results indicate that the rectangular cross-section burst control plate is an effective device in the suppression of airfoil stall. For 0.7 mm and 1 mm height BCPs, the stall angle is postponed by 2° for all positions, while for 0.3 mm and 1.5 mm height BCPs, the reduction in sudden fall of lift can be observed but at the cost of reduction in maximum lift coefficient. Among various configurations, the 1mm height BCP located at 0.2c position is found to be most effective in the suppression of stall.","PeriodicalId":306432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jacem.v6i0.38276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to achieve an improved airfoil performance at low Reynolds number, and to determine the optimum position and size of rectangular cross-section burst control plate (BCP) to suppress stall in airfoil. The type of airfoil used in the present study is NACA0015 (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) airfoil with 200 mm of chord (c) length. Here, rectangular cross-section burst control plates with different sizes and at different locations are investigated numerically at the low Reynolds number of 1.6×105. Total of three positions (0.05c, 0.1c and 0.2c from the leading edge of airfoil), and four sizes (with heights 0.3 mm, 0.7mm, 1mm and 1.5 mm, and constant width 4 mm) of rectangular BCPs are simulated in ANSYS Fluent software using Transition SST model. The results indicate that the rectangular cross-section burst control plate is an effective device in the suppression of airfoil stall. For 0.7 mm and 1 mm height BCPs, the stall angle is postponed by 2° for all positions, while for 0.3 mm and 1.5 mm height BCPs, the reduction in sudden fall of lift can be observed but at the cost of reduction in maximum lift coefficient. Among various configurations, the 1mm height BCP located at 0.2c position is found to be most effective in the suppression of stall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NACA0015翼型失速抑制数值模拟研究
为了提高翼型在低雷诺数下的性能,确定矩形横截面爆炸控制板(BCP)抑制翼型失速的最佳位置和尺寸。在目前的研究中使用的翼型的类型是NACA0015(国家咨询委员会航空)翼型弦(c)长度200毫米。本文在低雷诺数1.6×105条件下,对不同尺寸、不同位置的矩形截面爆发控制板进行了数值研究。采用Transition SST模型,在ANSYS Fluent软件中对矩形bcp的三个位置(距翼型前缘0.05c、0.1c和0.2c)和四种尺寸(高度分别为0.3 mm、0.7mm、1mm和1.5 mm,宽度恒定为4mm)进行了仿真。结果表明,矩形横截面爆破控制板是抑制翼型失速的有效装置。对于0.7 mm和1 mm高度的bcp,所有位置的失速角延迟2°,而对于0.3 mm和1.5 mm高度的bcp,可以观察到升力突然下降的减少,但代价是最大升力系数的降低。在各种配置中,位于0.2c位置的1mm高度BCP对抑制失速最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance Evaluation of Domestic Airport Departure Hall TIA, Kathmandu Production and Carbon Emission Calculation of Bricks Incorporating Construction And Demolition Waste and Pet Pellets Design Demand of RC Building as per Soil Type Pre and Post Earthquake Slope Stability Analysis Using Equivalent Linear Method – a Case Study of Jure Landslide Performance Evaluation of Artificial Angular Fly Ash Aggregate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1