Public Spaces, spaces of public domain: Icons of a contemporary simulacrum?

M. R. Alves
{"title":"Public Spaces, spaces of public domain: Icons of a contemporary simulacrum?","authors":"M. R. Alves","doi":"10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary city is a result of plural connections between the historical matrix and the effects of global policies. Immersed in a flux of multiple contents, it seems to respond to an era of transition in which the sense of belonging to an urban space is profoundly tensioned by transformations in the cultural, social, technological and political dimensions of public space. On the one hand, contemporary urban territorialities bring new possibilities to issues related to urban morphology and fabric that are still mainly culturally determined; on the other, contemporary thinking confronts itself with the tendency of a global scenario where public life and contemporary culture are related to consumption and capital circulation. Although relations of belonging and attachment to the urban space may persist, the flow of global conditions seems to have an impact upon collective experience in the urban territory and in the production of public space. These are transformations that may lead not only to the instrumentalization of space but also to the reduction of its ‘public’ value. In the contemporary city we observe particular processes of functional and economic spatializations of the urban where public spaces are not conceived as spaces of a public realm. Noting that the intersection between past/present time-cultural flows should go beyond the (re)production of any new global paradigm of thematic urban configurations, we argue that the theoretical constructs of the contemporary public space, or spaces of public domain, must be representative not of a thematic ‘everywhere-nowhere’ urban environment, but rather of a public life urbanity, one built upon awareness and around political and civic issues.","PeriodicalId":214794,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Territory","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Territory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contemporary city is a result of plural connections between the historical matrix and the effects of global policies. Immersed in a flux of multiple contents, it seems to respond to an era of transition in which the sense of belonging to an urban space is profoundly tensioned by transformations in the cultural, social, technological and political dimensions of public space. On the one hand, contemporary urban territorialities bring new possibilities to issues related to urban morphology and fabric that are still mainly culturally determined; on the other, contemporary thinking confronts itself with the tendency of a global scenario where public life and contemporary culture are related to consumption and capital circulation. Although relations of belonging and attachment to the urban space may persist, the flow of global conditions seems to have an impact upon collective experience in the urban territory and in the production of public space. These are transformations that may lead not only to the instrumentalization of space but also to the reduction of its ‘public’ value. In the contemporary city we observe particular processes of functional and economic spatializations of the urban where public spaces are not conceived as spaces of a public realm. Noting that the intersection between past/present time-cultural flows should go beyond the (re)production of any new global paradigm of thematic urban configurations, we argue that the theoretical constructs of the contemporary public space, or spaces of public domain, must be representative not of a thematic ‘everywhere-nowhere’ urban environment, but rather of a public life urbanity, one built upon awareness and around political and civic issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共空间,公共领域的空间:当代拟像的图标?
当代城市是历史矩阵与全球政策影响之间多重联系的结果。沉浸在多元内容的流动中,它似乎回应了一个转型的时代,在这个时代,城市空间的归属感被公共空间的文化、社会、技术和政治维度的转变所深刻地紧张起来。一方面,当代城市地域性为主要由文化决定的城市形态和结构问题带来了新的可能性;另一方面,当代思维面临着公共生活和当代文化与消费和资本流通相关的全球情景的趋势。虽然对城市空间的归属和依恋关系可能持续存在,但全球条件的流动似乎对城市领土和公共空间的生产中的集体经验产生了影响。这些转变不仅可能导致空间的工具化,也可能导致其“公共”价值的降低。在当代城市中,我们观察到城市功能和经济空间化的特殊过程,公共空间不被视为公共领域的空间。注意到过去/现在时间-文化流动之间的交集应该超越任何主题城市配置的新全球范式的(再)生产,我们认为当代公共空间或公共领域空间的理论建构必须代表的不是主题“无处不在”的城市环境,而是公共生活的城市性,建立在意识之上,围绕政治和公民问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web 2.0 tools as framework for participation and co-creation Public Spaces, spaces of public domain: Icons of a contemporary simulacrum? Modifying and co-creating the urban soundscape through digital technologies Exploring co-creation as a learning process to (re)think public space from a transformative perspective Use and appropriation as the everyday design of public space in the Bexiga Neighbourhood (são paulo)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1