Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Health-Related Issues Among Women and Children: A Research Review

L. Corradi
{"title":"Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Health-Related Issues Among Women and Children: A Research Review","authors":"L. Corradi","doi":"10.23860/DIGNITY.2021.06.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From their first use in the late 1970s until the mid-1990s, Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) gave rise to serious concerns by feminists internationally. Their questions ranged from asking about health risks to ethical and political problems inherent in these technologies. However, over the last 25 years, interest in women’s health which used to be central to feminist theory and politics, progressively decreased and with it concerns about ART. Today, while the medical literature about health risks in ART is increasing, the topic of women’s health in relation to reproductive technologies remains marginal in feminist discourse, social sciences, and the mainstream media. On the basis of recent medical studies, published in peer reviewed scientific journals, this article aims to begin filling this gap. The author discusses adverse effects of ART for three groups of people from a feminist perspective: egg providers; surrogate mothers; and children who are born through in vitro fertilization (IVF), heterologous embryo transfer (HET), and surrogacy. Among the numerous health problems are ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS), birth defects, tumours in children, chromosomal damage, and cardiac and metabolic diseases. Serious questions arise about the long-term health of women who undergo repeated hormonal stimulations, sell their egg cells, or “rent” their wombs as surrogate mothers—a process entailing the exploitation of economically vulnerable women. It also addresses some of the ethical issues arising, such as the importance of risk disclosure to potential IVF users, egg providers, surrogate mothers and intended parents; children’s right to access all details regarding their genetic origins and their birth mother; and relevant psychosocial problems related to the use of ART. This paper calls for renewed critiques of women’s experiences with reproductive technologies so that they can become, yet again, an important part of the feminist movement.","PeriodicalId":347932,"journal":{"name":"Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23860/DIGNITY.2021.06.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From their first use in the late 1970s until the mid-1990s, Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) gave rise to serious concerns by feminists internationally. Their questions ranged from asking about health risks to ethical and political problems inherent in these technologies. However, over the last 25 years, interest in women’s health which used to be central to feminist theory and politics, progressively decreased and with it concerns about ART. Today, while the medical literature about health risks in ART is increasing, the topic of women’s health in relation to reproductive technologies remains marginal in feminist discourse, social sciences, and the mainstream media. On the basis of recent medical studies, published in peer reviewed scientific journals, this article aims to begin filling this gap. The author discusses adverse effects of ART for three groups of people from a feminist perspective: egg providers; surrogate mothers; and children who are born through in vitro fertilization (IVF), heterologous embryo transfer (HET), and surrogacy. Among the numerous health problems are ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS), birth defects, tumours in children, chromosomal damage, and cardiac and metabolic diseases. Serious questions arise about the long-term health of women who undergo repeated hormonal stimulations, sell their egg cells, or “rent” their wombs as surrogate mothers—a process entailing the exploitation of economically vulnerable women. It also addresses some of the ethical issues arising, such as the importance of risk disclosure to potential IVF users, egg providers, surrogate mothers and intended parents; children’s right to access all details regarding their genetic origins and their birth mother; and relevant psychosocial problems related to the use of ART. This paper calls for renewed critiques of women’s experiences with reproductive technologies so that they can become, yet again, an important part of the feminist movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术与妇女和儿童健康相关问题:研究综述
从20世纪70年代末首次使用到90年代中期,辅助生殖技术(ART)引起了国际女权主义者的严重关注。他们提出的问题从健康风险到这些技术所固有的伦理和政治问题不等。然而,在过去25年中,对妇女健康的兴趣——这曾经是女权主义理论和政治的核心——逐渐减少,对抗逆转录病毒治疗的关注也随之减少。今天,虽然关于抗逆转录病毒治疗的健康风险的医学文献越来越多,但妇女健康与生殖技术有关的话题在女权主义话语、社会科学和主流媒体中仍然处于边缘地位。根据最近发表在同行评议的科学期刊上的医学研究,本文旨在开始填补这一空白。作者从女权主义的角度讨论了ART对三种人群的不良影响:卵子提供者;代孕母亲;以及通过体外受精(IVF)、异源胚胎移植(HET)和代孕出生的儿童。在众多的健康问题中有卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)、出生缺陷、儿童肿瘤、染色体损伤以及心脏和代谢疾病。对于那些反复接受荷尔蒙刺激、出售卵细胞或“出租”子宫作为代孕母亲的妇女的长期健康,出现了严重的问题——这一过程包含了对经济上脆弱的妇女的剥削。它还解决了一些出现的伦理问题,例如向潜在的试管婴儿用户、卵子提供者、代孕母亲和准父母披露风险的重要性;儿童有权获得有关其遗传来源及其生母的所有细节;以及与使用抗逆转录病毒治疗有关的相关社会心理问题。本文呼吁对女性在生殖技术方面的经验进行新的批评,使她们能够再次成为女权主义运动的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Censorship of Family Violence in Cinema in Iran Barriers to Escape: How Homelessness and Drug Addiction Prevent Women from Escaping Sex Trafficking and Commercial Sex Against the Mainstreaming of the Term Sex Work: Advocacy with India's Supreme Court Immigrant Women from Iran and Afghanistan in Sweden: Experiences of Domestic Violence During the COVID Pandemic The Happy Hooker Revisited: Trauma and Sexualized Memories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1