Zhipeng Yan, K. Cheung, Eric Ho-Yin Lau, Ching‐lung Lai
{"title":"Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Zhipeng Yan, K. Cheung, Eric Ho-Yin Lau, Ching‐lung Lai","doi":"10.31487/j.rgm.2020.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronavirus Disease in 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection.\nOver 53 million people have been infected with over 1.3 million deaths. However, there is no standard\ntreatment or vaccines to date. Recently, several randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have\ndemonstrated the efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients. This is a systematic\nreview and meta-analysis to define its efficacy.\nMethods: A systematic review was done on databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane) on 9 Nov\n2020. Search keywords were remdesivir, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, randomized controlled trials and cohort\nstudies. Studies with high-evidence values were selected to evaluate its clinical efficacy in terms of risk\nratio, time to clinical improvement, and mortality risk. Subgroup analysis was performed based on baseline\nhospitalization status, age and ethnicity.\nResults: Of the 1328 studies, 6 studies were selected and pooled for meta-analysis. Remdesivir was\nassociated with clinical improvement (risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02). It shortened the mean\ntime of clinical improvement by 3.32 days (95% CI -4.37 to -2.28, p<0.001). However, its use was not\nassociated with reduced mortality risk (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.40–1.40). In subgroup analysis, remdesivir\nwas associated with clinical improvement in patients without the need of invasive ventilation (risk ratio\n1.90, 95% CI 1.58-2.29, p<0.001; hazard ratio 2.22, 95% CI, 1.64-3.02), and age less than 70 years (risk\nratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.39-3.28, p<0.001).\nConclusion: Remdesivir is effective in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients, in particular those\nwithout invasive ventilation","PeriodicalId":148803,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regenerative Medicine","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rgm.2020.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus Disease in 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Over 53 million people have been infected with over 1.3 million deaths. However, there is no standard
treatment or vaccines to date. Recently, several randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have
demonstrated the efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients. This is a systematic
review and meta-analysis to define its efficacy.
Methods: A systematic review was done on databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane) on 9 Nov
2020. Search keywords were remdesivir, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, randomized controlled trials and cohort
studies. Studies with high-evidence values were selected to evaluate its clinical efficacy in terms of risk
ratio, time to clinical improvement, and mortality risk. Subgroup analysis was performed based on baseline
hospitalization status, age and ethnicity.
Results: Of the 1328 studies, 6 studies were selected and pooled for meta-analysis. Remdesivir was
associated with clinical improvement (risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02). It shortened the mean
time of clinical improvement by 3.32 days (95% CI -4.37 to -2.28, p<0.001). However, its use was not
associated with reduced mortality risk (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.40–1.40). In subgroup analysis, remdesivir
was associated with clinical improvement in patients without the need of invasive ventilation (risk ratio
1.90, 95% CI 1.58-2.29, p<0.001; hazard ratio 2.22, 95% CI, 1.64-3.02), and age less than 70 years (risk
ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.39-3.28, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Remdesivir is effective in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients, in particular those
without invasive ventilation
背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是由SARS-CoV-2感染引起的大流行疾病。已有5300多万人感染,130多万人死亡。然而,目前还没有标准的治疗方法或疫苗。最近,几项随机对照试验和队列研究证明了瑞德西韦治疗COVID-19重症患者的有效性。这是一项系统的综述和荟萃分析,以确定其疗效。方法:于2020年11月9日对PubMed、Embase、Medline、Cochrane等数据库进行系统评价。搜索关键词为瑞德西韦、COVID-19、SARS-CoV-2、随机对照试验和队列研究。选择具有高证据价值的研究,从风险比、临床改善时间和死亡风险等方面评价其临床疗效。根据基线住院状况、年龄和种族进行亚组分析。结果:在1328项研究中,选择6项研究进行荟萃分析。瑞德西韦与临床改善相关(风险比1.14,95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02)。使临床改善时间缩短3.32天(95% CI -4.37 ~ -2.28, p<0.001)。然而,它的使用与降低死亡风险无关(风险比0.75,95% CI 0.40-1.40)。在亚组分析中,瑞德西韦与无需有创通气患者的临床改善相关(风险比1.90,95% CI 1.58-2.29, p<0.001;风险比2.22,95% CI, 1.64-3.02),年龄小于70岁(风险比2.14,95% CI 1.39-3.28, p<0.001)。结论:瑞德西韦治疗COVID-19重症患者疗效显著,尤其是无创通气患者