Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhipeng Yan, K. Cheung, Eric Ho-Yin Lau, Ching‐lung Lai
{"title":"Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Zhipeng Yan, K. Cheung, Eric Ho-Yin Lau, Ching‐lung Lai","doi":"10.31487/j.rgm.2020.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronavirus Disease in 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection.\nOver 53 million people have been infected with over 1.3 million deaths. However, there is no standard\ntreatment or vaccines to date. Recently, several randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have\ndemonstrated the efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients. This is a systematic\nreview and meta-analysis to define its efficacy.\nMethods: A systematic review was done on databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane) on 9 Nov\n2020. Search keywords were remdesivir, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, randomized controlled trials and cohort\nstudies. Studies with high-evidence values were selected to evaluate its clinical efficacy in terms of risk\nratio, time to clinical improvement, and mortality risk. Subgroup analysis was performed based on baseline\nhospitalization status, age and ethnicity.\nResults: Of the 1328 studies, 6 studies were selected and pooled for meta-analysis. Remdesivir was\nassociated with clinical improvement (risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02). It shortened the mean\ntime of clinical improvement by 3.32 days (95% CI -4.37 to -2.28, p<0.001). However, its use was not\nassociated with reduced mortality risk (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.40–1.40). In subgroup analysis, remdesivir\nwas associated with clinical improvement in patients without the need of invasive ventilation (risk ratio\n1.90, 95% CI 1.58-2.29, p<0.001; hazard ratio 2.22, 95% CI, 1.64-3.02), and age less than 70 years (risk\nratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.39-3.28, p<0.001).\nConclusion: Remdesivir is effective in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients, in particular those\nwithout invasive ventilation","PeriodicalId":148803,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regenerative Medicine","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rgm.2020.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus Disease in 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over 53 million people have been infected with over 1.3 million deaths. However, there is no standard treatment or vaccines to date. Recently, several randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have demonstrated the efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to define its efficacy. Methods: A systematic review was done on databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane) on 9 Nov 2020. Search keywords were remdesivir, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Studies with high-evidence values were selected to evaluate its clinical efficacy in terms of risk ratio, time to clinical improvement, and mortality risk. Subgroup analysis was performed based on baseline hospitalization status, age and ethnicity. Results: Of the 1328 studies, 6 studies were selected and pooled for meta-analysis. Remdesivir was associated with clinical improvement (risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02). It shortened the mean time of clinical improvement by 3.32 days (95% CI -4.37 to -2.28, p<0.001). However, its use was not associated with reduced mortality risk (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.40–1.40). In subgroup analysis, remdesivir was associated with clinical improvement in patients without the need of invasive ventilation (risk ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.58-2.29, p<0.001; hazard ratio 2.22, 95% CI, 1.64-3.02), and age less than 70 years (risk ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.39-3.28, p<0.001). Conclusion: Remdesivir is effective in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients, in particular those without invasive ventilation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞德西韦治疗重症SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19):系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是由SARS-CoV-2感染引起的大流行疾病。已有5300多万人感染,130多万人死亡。然而,目前还没有标准的治疗方法或疫苗。最近,几项随机对照试验和队列研究证明了瑞德西韦治疗COVID-19重症患者的有效性。这是一项系统的综述和荟萃分析,以确定其疗效。方法:于2020年11月9日对PubMed、Embase、Medline、Cochrane等数据库进行系统评价。搜索关键词为瑞德西韦、COVID-19、SARS-CoV-2、随机对照试验和队列研究。选择具有高证据价值的研究,从风险比、临床改善时间和死亡风险等方面评价其临床疗效。根据基线住院状况、年龄和种族进行亚组分析。结果:在1328项研究中,选择6项研究进行荟萃分析。瑞德西韦与临床改善相关(风险比1.14,95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02)。使临床改善时间缩短3.32天(95% CI -4.37 ~ -2.28, p<0.001)。然而,它的使用与降低死亡风险无关(风险比0.75,95% CI 0.40-1.40)。在亚组分析中,瑞德西韦与无需有创通气患者的临床改善相关(风险比1.90,95% CI 1.58-2.29, p<0.001;风险比2.22,95% CI, 1.64-3.02),年龄小于70岁(风险比2.14,95% CI 1.39-3.28, p<0.001)。结论:瑞德西韦治疗COVID-19重症患者疗效显著,尤其是无创通气患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifestylopathy: Unlocking Potential by Embracing Duality and Homeostasis for Improved Healthcare Calcium Phosphate Treatment Enhances Osteogenic Differentiation of Porcine Adipose-Derived Stem Cells on Fibrin Scaffolds In Vitro Migration of Porcine Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Platelet-Rich Plasma Directionality of Chemical Reaction and Spontaneity of Biological Process in the Context of Entropy Microfractured Adipose Tissue Graft for the Advanced Treatment of Non-Healing Cutaneous Fistulas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1