Determinants of Budgetary Slack in the Laboratory: An Investigation of Controls for Self-Interested Behavior

Abstract

This study investigates determinants of budgetary slack using the framework of agency theory and the methods of experimental economics. A computerized, five-period experiment is designed to test the robustness of prior experimental results documenting budgeting behavior inconsistent with economic rationality and self-interest. Similar to prior experiments, pay scheme and information asymmetry are manipulated. In addition, a personality questionnaire and several questions on an exit questionnaire are included to test the effects of reputation and ethical concerns on budgetary slack. A two-way analysis of variance with pay scheme and information asymmetry as factors finds a significant effect for pay scheme, information asymmetry, and their interaction. By controlling social interactions and increasing subject experience, this study is able to document slack levels closer to agency predictions than prior experimental studies. Nevertheless, subjects given the slack-inducing pay scheme are found to restrict the amount of slack in their budgets below 100% (36% to 60% on average) and subjects given the truth-inducing pay scheme are found to build a small but significant amount of slack under most experimental conditions (3.2% to 4% on average). A regression analysis with non-pecuniary factors added to the model finds that budgetary slack is also reduced by reputation concerns, ethical concerns, and a measure of ethical responsibility from the personality questionnaire. This study is able to explain more of the variance in slack than prior studies using traditional agency variables alone.