COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC BANK PERFORMANCE BASED ON RGEC AND ISLAMICITY PERFORMANCE INDEX

D. Harahap, R. Lubis, Siti Ena Aisyah Simbolon, Ferri Alfadri
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC BANK PERFORMANCE BASED ON RGEC AND ISLAMICITY PERFORMANCE INDEX","authors":"D. Harahap, R. Lubis, Siti Ena Aisyah Simbolon, Ferri Alfadri","doi":"10.31958/imara.v6i2.5883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative Analysis of Islamic Bank Performance Based on RGEC and Islamicity Performance Index. The increase in Islamic banking makes Islamic banks must be able to maintain their performance in order to survive. The performance of Islamic banks can be measured using the CAMELS method until 2013, but after the issuance of PBI Number 13/1/PBI/2011 and POJK Number 8/POJK.03/2014 regarding the assessment of the soundness of Islamic banks, Islamic banks used the RGEC method. However, the RGEC method is not able to reveal the social function of a bank. Meanwhile, Islamic banks need a measuring instrument that is able to reveal the social function of the bank. So this research uses the Islamicity Performance Index method. Therefore, the problem in the research is how to compare the performance of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk and PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk based on RGEC and Islamicity Performance Index. The population in this study is the financial performance report data of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk and PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk in 2016-2020. The samples in this study are financial ratios, namely NPF, FDR, GCG, ROA, CAR, PSR, ZPR, EDR, IIR, and IsIR. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique used independent sample t-test and Mann Whitney test. The result of this research is the performance of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk is better than the performance of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk.","PeriodicalId":348178,"journal":{"name":"Imara: JURNAL RISET EKONOMI ISLAM","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imara: JURNAL RISET EKONOMI ISLAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31958/imara.v6i2.5883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Comparative Analysis of Islamic Bank Performance Based on RGEC and Islamicity Performance Index. The increase in Islamic banking makes Islamic banks must be able to maintain their performance in order to survive. The performance of Islamic banks can be measured using the CAMELS method until 2013, but after the issuance of PBI Number 13/1/PBI/2011 and POJK Number 8/POJK.03/2014 regarding the assessment of the soundness of Islamic banks, Islamic banks used the RGEC method. However, the RGEC method is not able to reveal the social function of a bank. Meanwhile, Islamic banks need a measuring instrument that is able to reveal the social function of the bank. So this research uses the Islamicity Performance Index method. Therefore, the problem in the research is how to compare the performance of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk and PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk based on RGEC and Islamicity Performance Index. The population in this study is the financial performance report data of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk and PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk in 2016-2020. The samples in this study are financial ratios, namely NPF, FDR, GCG, ROA, CAR, PSR, ZPR, EDR, IIR, and IsIR. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique used independent sample t-test and Mann Whitney test. The result of this research is the performance of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk is better than the performance of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于rgec与伊斯兰性绩效指标的伊斯兰银行绩效比较分析
基于RGEC和伊斯兰性绩效指数的伊斯兰银行绩效比较分析。伊斯兰银行的增加使得伊斯兰银行必须能够维持他们的业绩才能生存。在2013年之前,伊斯兰银行的绩效可以使用camel方法进行衡量,但在PBI号13/1/PBI/2011和POJK号8/POJK发布之后。2014年3月关于评估伊斯兰银行的稳健性,伊斯兰银行使用RGEC方法。然而,RGEC方法并不能揭示银行的社会功能。同时,伊斯兰银行需要一种能够揭示银行社会功能的衡量工具。因此,本研究采用了伊斯兰性绩效指数法。因此,研究的问题是如何基于RGEC和伊斯兰化绩效指数来比较印尼穆马拉银行Tbk和曼迪利银行Tbk的绩效。本研究中的人口是PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk和PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Tbk在2016-2020年的财务业绩报告数据。本研究的样本为财务比率,即NPF、FDR、GCG、ROA、CAR、PSR、ZPR、EDR、IIR和IsIR。数据分析采用独立样本t检验和Mann Whitney检验。本研究的结果是PT. Bank ysariah Mandiri Tbk的绩效优于PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT F REVENUE SHARE OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH FINANCING PROCEEDS ON RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) OF AN ISLAMIC BANK: A CASE STUDY THE ROLE OF ZISWAF IN ENSURING THE RESILIENCE OF MSMES DURING THE COVIDͳ19 PANDEMIC IN INDONESIA THE ECONOMY AND POVERTY REDUCTION; A DIMENSION OF HEALTH IN ISLAM COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC BANK PERFORMANCE BASED ON RGEC AND ISLAMICITY PERFORMANCE INDEX SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF HALAL TOURISM IN IMPROVING THE ECONOMY OF THE COMMUNITY ISLAMIC ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1