Polarization and the Role of Digital Media

Micol Burighel
{"title":"Polarization and the Role of Digital Media","authors":"Micol Burighel","doi":"10.33112/nm.14.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nordicum-Mediterraneum. Icelandic E-Journal of Nordicum and Mediterranean Studies (DOI code, author's name and issue details are available on the journal's website) Group polarization is a serious and worrying phenomenon developing in democratic societies. It occurs «when members of a deliberating group move toward a more extreme point in whatever direction is indicated by the members’ predeliberation tendency» (Sunstein, 1999: 3-4). As a result, after a discussion where different points of view emerge, people tend to align to the opinion they were already tending to, before the discussion itself. For example, if confronted with someone that supports a different position, people who believe that vaccines are linked to autism will adhere to their pre-existing perspectives with much more conviction; the same will occur between left-leaning voters or pro-feminist activists and so on.","PeriodicalId":273795,"journal":{"name":"Us’ vs. ‘Them’: The rhetoric of ‘othering’ from Aristotle to Frank Westerman","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Us’ vs. ‘Them’: The rhetoric of ‘othering’ from Aristotle to Frank Westerman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.14.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nordicum-Mediterraneum. Icelandic E-Journal of Nordicum and Mediterranean Studies (DOI code, author's name and issue details are available on the journal's website) Group polarization is a serious and worrying phenomenon developing in democratic societies. It occurs «when members of a deliberating group move toward a more extreme point in whatever direction is indicated by the members’ predeliberation tendency» (Sunstein, 1999: 3-4). As a result, after a discussion where different points of view emerge, people tend to align to the opinion they were already tending to, before the discussion itself. For example, if confronted with someone that supports a different position, people who believe that vaccines are linked to autism will adhere to their pre-existing perspectives with much more conviction; the same will occur between left-leaning voters or pro-feminist activists and so on.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两极分化与数字媒体的作用
Nordicum-Mediterraneum。冰岛Nordicum和地中海研究电子期刊(DOI代码,作者的名字和细节问题都可以在《华尔街日报》网站)群体极化是一种非常严重的、令人担忧的现象在民主社会发展。它发生在“当一个审议群体的成员在成员的预先审议倾向所指示的方向上向一个更极端的点移动时”(Sunstein, 1999: 3-4)。因此,在讨论之后,不同的观点出现了,人们倾向于在讨论之前就倾向于他们已经倾向的观点。例如,如果面对支持不同立场的人,相信疫苗与自闭症有关的人会更加坚定地坚持他们已有的观点;同样的情况也会发生在左倾选民或支持女权主义的积极分子之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Us and Them: The Logic of Othering from Pink Floyd to Populists The Rhetoric of Identity in Right- and Left-wing Populism: A Brief Survey The Other Polarization and the Role of Digital Media The Changing Feelings of Otherness: Surprise, empathy, hostility as evidenced in Frank Westerman’s El negro and me
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1