The role of teaching advanced technological knowledge to enhance experimental creativity in knit design.

M. Motta, D. Dumitrescu
{"title":"The role of teaching advanced technological knowledge to enhance experimental creativity in knit design.","authors":"M. Motta, D. Dumitrescu","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitalization is one of the main grounds for discussion in the textile manufacturing industry. As in other creative fields, digitalization in textile design has brought craftsmanship together with work using digital tools and mechanical processes to creatively embed advanced knowledge in structural design and this dualism is even stronger in the field of knitwear design. For years, knitting technologies have been considered far from creativity and entirely delegated to the expertise of technicians, and design education has often focused on fostering artistic expression by teaching highly creative manual/mechanical processes. In the ongoing shift towards digitalization and the challenges of Industry 4.0, research and education in knitting design must redefine the programming of industrial machines as a tool for designers to push their experimental creativity together with their technical knowledge. This article reports an investigation made by the authors in the two different contexts of the School of Design of Politecnico di Milano and of the Swedish School of Textile in Borås. Using the method of constructive alignment (Biggs, J. B. & Tang, C. S., 2011), the investigation set up a comparison of two practice-based methods for training designers in programming industrial knitting machines. The authors mapped the teaching, learning activities and expected learning outcomes specific for each course and analysed quintessential aspects that occur in the learning process in the transition from manual to digital tools. The research had the aim of understanding what kind of knowledge should be transferred, in which way and with which purpose, to make programming an integral and effective part of the learning process for knit designers. The data collected have been used to highlight similarities and differences between the two programmes, identify impactful items and open future research that could foster improvements with shared solutions.","PeriodicalId":448346,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors for Apparel and Textile Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors for Apparel and Textile Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digitalization is one of the main grounds for discussion in the textile manufacturing industry. As in other creative fields, digitalization in textile design has brought craftsmanship together with work using digital tools and mechanical processes to creatively embed advanced knowledge in structural design and this dualism is even stronger in the field of knitwear design. For years, knitting technologies have been considered far from creativity and entirely delegated to the expertise of technicians, and design education has often focused on fostering artistic expression by teaching highly creative manual/mechanical processes. In the ongoing shift towards digitalization and the challenges of Industry 4.0, research and education in knitting design must redefine the programming of industrial machines as a tool for designers to push their experimental creativity together with their technical knowledge. This article reports an investigation made by the authors in the two different contexts of the School of Design of Politecnico di Milano and of the Swedish School of Textile in Borås. Using the method of constructive alignment (Biggs, J. B. & Tang, C. S., 2011), the investigation set up a comparison of two practice-based methods for training designers in programming industrial knitting machines. The authors mapped the teaching, learning activities and expected learning outcomes specific for each course and analysed quintessential aspects that occur in the learning process in the transition from manual to digital tools. The research had the aim of understanding what kind of knowledge should be transferred, in which way and with which purpose, to make programming an integral and effective part of the learning process for knit designers. The data collected have been used to highlight similarities and differences between the two programmes, identify impactful items and open future research that could foster improvements with shared solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先进技术知识的传授对提高针织设计实验创造力的作用。
数字化是纺织制造业讨论的主要理由之一。与其他创意领域一样,纺织品设计中的数字化将工艺与使用数字工具和机械过程的工作结合在一起,创造性地将先进的知识嵌入到结构设计中,这种二元论在针织品设计领域更为强烈。多年来,编织技术一直被认为远离创造力,完全委托给技术人员的专业知识,设计教育往往侧重于通过教授高度创造性的手工/机械工艺来培养艺术表现力。在不断向数字化转变和工业4.0的挑战中,针织设计的研究和教育必须重新定义工业机器的编程,使其成为设计师将实验创造力与技术知识结合起来的工具。本文报道了作者在米兰理工大学设计学院和瑞典纺织学院两种不同背景下所做的调查。使用建设性对齐方法(Biggs, j.b. & Tang, c.s., 2011),调查建立了两种基于实践的方法来培训设计师编程工业针织机的比较。作者绘制了每门课程的教学、学习活动和预期学习成果,并分析了从手工工具到数字工具过渡过程中学习过程中出现的典型方面。这项研究的目的是了解什么样的知识应该被转移,以何种方式和目的,使编程成为编织设计师学习过程中不可或缺的有效部分。收集到的数据被用来强调两个项目之间的异同,确定有影响的项目,并开启未来的研究,以促进共享解决方案的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design as an enhancer of the circular economy in fashion Experimental Data Management for the Panel Joints of the Naval Emergency Shuttle A pilot study of posture change when wearing high-heeled shoes and pantyhose The effect of anti-itch fiber on the quality of sleeping Biodyes: A new solution for textile dyeing technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1