Growth Opportunities and IPO Initial Performance. Is There an Interacting Effect of Public Issue?

Siti Salwa Abdul Rahman, Norliza Che-Yahya
{"title":"Growth Opportunities and IPO Initial Performance. Is There an Interacting Effect of Public Issue?","authors":"Siti Salwa Abdul Rahman, Norliza Che-Yahya","doi":"10.24191/jibe.v5i1.14285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The declining rate on initial return of Malaysian IPOs over the past years have alarmed investors to astutely choose IPO firms for a better security of their investment’s income. In an attempt to offer an aid for the danger on the loss of capital that the investors might suffer, this study is initiated to search for explanations on the variation of IPO returns particularly in the initial aftermarket. This study proposes “growth opportunities in an IPO firm” and “allocation of IPOs through public issue approach” as its main explanatory factors which the former acts as main explanatory variable while the latter serves as interacting variable. This study defines “growth opportunities of firms” as the possibility of an IPO firm to enlarge its market share over the long period. The “growth opportunities of firms” are measured by the total allocation amount received from the issuance of IPOs to activities (e.g., assets acquisition and business expansion) which possibly support growth of a firm in a future. To an extent, a higher amount of proceeds channeled to “growth activities” are expected to increase growth opportunities of firms such that will encourage higher participation on the shares of the issuing firms as well as higher returns of the shares. Nonetheless, “growth opportunities of firms” can be accurately gauged only if the amount of cash from the sale of IPOs are owned by the issuing firms. That is, the public issue approach that an IPO firm adopts when issue for its shares to public should finalize the final proceeds eligible to be allocated to any intended activities of the firm. Using a total 447 IPOs listed in Main Market and ACE Market of Bursa Malaysia from 2000 to 2018, tested using hierarchical regression models, this study found that the proceeds allocated to growth activities significantly positively influence initial return. However, this study is not able to produce a significant interaction effect of public issue on the main relationship tested earlier.","PeriodicalId":258234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/jibe.v5i1.14285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The declining rate on initial return of Malaysian IPOs over the past years have alarmed investors to astutely choose IPO firms for a better security of their investment’s income. In an attempt to offer an aid for the danger on the loss of capital that the investors might suffer, this study is initiated to search for explanations on the variation of IPO returns particularly in the initial aftermarket. This study proposes “growth opportunities in an IPO firm” and “allocation of IPOs through public issue approach” as its main explanatory factors which the former acts as main explanatory variable while the latter serves as interacting variable. This study defines “growth opportunities of firms” as the possibility of an IPO firm to enlarge its market share over the long period. The “growth opportunities of firms” are measured by the total allocation amount received from the issuance of IPOs to activities (e.g., assets acquisition and business expansion) which possibly support growth of a firm in a future. To an extent, a higher amount of proceeds channeled to “growth activities” are expected to increase growth opportunities of firms such that will encourage higher participation on the shares of the issuing firms as well as higher returns of the shares. Nonetheless, “growth opportunities of firms” can be accurately gauged only if the amount of cash from the sale of IPOs are owned by the issuing firms. That is, the public issue approach that an IPO firm adopts when issue for its shares to public should finalize the final proceeds eligible to be allocated to any intended activities of the firm. Using a total 447 IPOs listed in Main Market and ACE Market of Bursa Malaysia from 2000 to 2018, tested using hierarchical regression models, this study found that the proceeds allocated to growth activities significantly positively influence initial return. However, this study is not able to produce a significant interaction effect of public issue on the main relationship tested earlier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增长机会与IPO初始表现。公共议题是否存在互动效应?
过去几年,马来西亚IPO的初始回报率不断下降,这让投资者警觉起来,他们要明智地选择IPO公司,以更好地保障投资收益。为了对投资者可能遭受的资本损失风险提供帮助,本研究开始寻找IPO收益变化的解释,特别是在最初的售后市场。本研究提出“IPO公司的成长机会”和“通过公开发行方式配置IPO”作为其主要解释因素,其中前者为主要解释变量,后者为交互变量。本研究将“企业成长机会”定义为IPO企业在长期内扩大市场份额的可能性。“公司的增长机会”是通过从发行ipo到可能支持公司未来增长的活动(例如,资产收购和业务扩张)所收到的总分配金额来衡量的。在某种程度上,流向“增长活动”的更多收益预计将增加公司的增长机会,从而鼓励更多地参与发行公司的股票以及更高的股票回报。尽管如此,“公司的增长机会”只有在发行公司拥有ipo销售的现金量时才能准确衡量。也就是说,IPO公司在向公众发行股票时采用的公开发行方法应该最终确定有资格分配给公司任何预期活动的最终收益。本研究利用2000年至2018年在马来西亚交易所主板市场和ACE市场上市的447只ipo,使用层次回归模型进行测试,发现分配给成长性活动的收益显著正影响初始回报。然而,本研究并未发现公共议题对先前测试的主要关系有显著的交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of Waqf Contribution Awareness among Indonesian Workers Through Digital System Beyond Supply Chains: Investigating the Economic Impact of Logistics Performance The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Event Management Industry Are You a Panic Buyer? Observations from Consumers in Malaysia The Challenges of Disabled Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1