Verification of sinusoidal steady state system identification of a Phantom Omni haptic device using data driven modeling

B. Milne, H. Beelen, R. Merks, S. Weiland, Xiaoqi Chen, C. Hann, R. Parker
{"title":"Verification of sinusoidal steady state system identification of a Phantom Omni haptic device using data driven modeling","authors":"B. Milne, H. Beelen, R. Merks, S. Weiland, Xiaoqi Chen, C. Hann, R. Parker","doi":"10.1109/ICARA.2015.7081161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haptic feedback has two important sources of dynamics: the machine being controlled and the haptic device itself. This paper concentrates on the means of identifying the dynamics of a Phantom Omni haptic feedback device. Two models are compared: a dynamic model with parameters using results from sinusoidal steady state analysis and a data driven model that uses pseudo-random binary sequences (PRBS) for identification. The overall form of the frequency and phase response is well-defined for the dynamics model but for the data driven model a spectral estimate from PRBS response data is used to determine the model order. The results in this paper show that a dynamic equation based minimal model produces accuracy as good as the data driven model. While the data driven model has more fitting accuracy the increase in accuracy is not useful for modelling the physical response as the differences occur at high frequencies where the Phantom arm is not sensitive anyway. The dynamic model is particularly useful as it gives a physical basis for the observed output and the sinusoidal steady state behaviour is useful for exposing non-linearities. Future work includes development and verification an arm inertia model that allows system parameters to be identified from response data at arbitrary arm angles.","PeriodicalId":176657,"journal":{"name":"2015 6th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 6th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARA.2015.7081161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Haptic feedback has two important sources of dynamics: the machine being controlled and the haptic device itself. This paper concentrates on the means of identifying the dynamics of a Phantom Omni haptic feedback device. Two models are compared: a dynamic model with parameters using results from sinusoidal steady state analysis and a data driven model that uses pseudo-random binary sequences (PRBS) for identification. The overall form of the frequency and phase response is well-defined for the dynamics model but for the data driven model a spectral estimate from PRBS response data is used to determine the model order. The results in this paper show that a dynamic equation based minimal model produces accuracy as good as the data driven model. While the data driven model has more fitting accuracy the increase in accuracy is not useful for modelling the physical response as the differences occur at high frequencies where the Phantom arm is not sensitive anyway. The dynamic model is particularly useful as it gives a physical basis for the observed output and the sinusoidal steady state behaviour is useful for exposing non-linearities. Future work includes development and verification an arm inertia model that allows system parameters to be identified from response data at arbitrary arm angles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用数据驱动建模验证Phantom Omni触觉设备的正弦稳态系统识别
触觉反馈有两个重要的动力来源:被控制的机器和触觉设备本身。本文主要研究了Phantom Omni触觉反馈装置的动态辨识方法。比较了两种模型:采用正弦稳态分析结果的动态模型和采用伪随机二值序列(PRBS)进行识别的数据驱动模型。对于动态模型,频率和相位响应的总体形式是明确定义的,但对于数据驱动模型,使用来自PRBS响应数据的频谱估计来确定模型顺序。结果表明,基于动态方程的最小模型与数据驱动模型的精度相当。虽然数据驱动模型具有更高的拟合精度,但精度的提高对于模拟物理响应没有用处,因为差异发生在高频率,而Phantom手臂无论如何都不敏感。动态模型特别有用,因为它为观察到的输出提供了物理基础,而正弦稳态行为对于揭示非线性是有用的。未来的工作包括开发和验证手臂惯性模型,该模型允许从任意手臂角度的响应数据中识别系统参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated weighing by sequential inference in dynamic environments Implementing a HARMS-based software system for use in collective robotics applications Concepts and simulations of a soft robot mimicking human tongue Application of Inverse Simulation to a wheeled mobile robot Design and experimental testing of vehicle-following control for small electric vehicles with communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1