Quality-aware human-driven information fusion model

L. C. Botega, Valdir A. Pereira, Allan Oliveira, J. F. Saran, L. Villas, R. B. Araujo
{"title":"Quality-aware human-driven information fusion model","authors":"L. C. Botega, Valdir A. Pereira, Allan Oliveira, J. F. Saran, L. Villas, R. B. Araujo","doi":"10.23919/ICIF.2017.8009851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situational Awareness (SAW) is a widespread concept in areas that require critical decision-making and refers to the level of consciousness that an individual or team has about a situation. A poor SAW can induce humans to failures in the decision-making process, leading to losses of lives and property damage. Data fusion processes present opportunities to enrich the knowledge about situations by integrating heterogeneous and synergistic data from different sources and transforming them into more meaningful subsidies for decision-making. However, a problem arises when information is subject to problems concerning its quality, especially when humans are the main sources of data (HUMINT). Motivated by the informational demand from the emergency management domain and by the limitations and challenges of the state of the art, this work proposes and describes a new information fusion model, called Quantify (Quality-aware Human-Driven Information Fusion Model), whose main contribution is the exhaustive use of the quality information management throughout the fusion process to parameterize and to guide the work of humans and systems. To validate the model, an emergency situation assessment system prototype was developed, called ESAS (Emergency Situation Assessment Systems). Then, experts from the Sao Paulo State Police (PMESP) tested the prototypes and the system was evaluated using SART (Situation Awareness Rating Technique), which showed higher rates of SAW using the Quantify model, compared to the model from the state-of-the-art, especially in questions relating to the components of resource supply and situational understanding.","PeriodicalId":148407,"journal":{"name":"2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICIF.2017.8009851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Situational Awareness (SAW) is a widespread concept in areas that require critical decision-making and refers to the level of consciousness that an individual or team has about a situation. A poor SAW can induce humans to failures in the decision-making process, leading to losses of lives and property damage. Data fusion processes present opportunities to enrich the knowledge about situations by integrating heterogeneous and synergistic data from different sources and transforming them into more meaningful subsidies for decision-making. However, a problem arises when information is subject to problems concerning its quality, especially when humans are the main sources of data (HUMINT). Motivated by the informational demand from the emergency management domain and by the limitations and challenges of the state of the art, this work proposes and describes a new information fusion model, called Quantify (Quality-aware Human-Driven Information Fusion Model), whose main contribution is the exhaustive use of the quality information management throughout the fusion process to parameterize and to guide the work of humans and systems. To validate the model, an emergency situation assessment system prototype was developed, called ESAS (Emergency Situation Assessment Systems). Then, experts from the Sao Paulo State Police (PMESP) tested the prototypes and the system was evaluated using SART (Situation Awareness Rating Technique), which showed higher rates of SAW using the Quantify model, compared to the model from the state-of-the-art, especially in questions relating to the components of resource supply and situational understanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有质量意识的人驱动信息融合模型
情境意识(Situational Awareness, SAW)是一个在需要关键决策的领域中广泛使用的概念,它指的是个人或团队对某种情况的意识水平。一个糟糕的SAW会导致人类在决策过程中失败,导致生命损失和财产损失。数据融合过程通过整合来自不同来源的异构和协同数据并将其转化为更有意义的决策补贴,为丰富有关情况的知识提供了机会。但是,当信息的质量出现问题时,特别是当人类是数据的主要来源时,就会出现问题(HUMINT)。基于应急管理领域的信息需求和现有技术的局限性和挑战,本文提出并描述了一种新的信息融合模型,称为量化(质量意识的人类驱动的信息融合模型),其主要贡献是在整个融合过程中详尽地使用质量信息管理来参数化和指导人类和系统的工作。为了验证该模型,开发了一个紧急情况评估系统原型,称为ESAS(紧急情况评估系统)。然后,来自圣保罗州警察局(PMESP)的专家测试了原型,并使用SART(态势感知评级技术)对系统进行了评估,与最先进的模型相比,使用量化模型的SAW率更高,特别是在与资源供应组成部分和态势理解相关的问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep learning for situational understanding Event state based particle filter for ball event detection in volleyball game analysis Hybrid regularization for compressed sensing MRI: Exploiting shearlet transform and group-sparsity total variation A risk-based sensor management using random finite sets and POMDP Track a smoothly maneuvering target based on trajectory estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1