Helena Wasle, Anne Goralzik, Birte Thomas-friedrich, David Schackmann, Esther Bosch
{"title":"When Something Is in the Way: Parameters of Perception and Reaction Speed\n in Train Drivers","authors":"Helena Wasle, Anne Goralzik, Birte Thomas-friedrich, David Schackmann, Esther Bosch","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A challenge for automation in open track railway systems is the lack of\n safety standards for obstacle detection and benchmarks for the performance\n of automated systems. In this work, the foundation for such a benchmark was\n established with the help of two studies aimed at understanding the reaction\n time mechanisms of this task. A simulator experiment with professional train\n drivers and an online study with a larger sample of non-train-drivers were\n conducted to analyze the reaction time to obstacles along the tracks. The\n size and contrast of the obstacles, as well as driving speed and use of\n train protection systems, were varied in a within-subjects design and their\n effects on reaction time were analyzed with a linear regression model on\n log-transformed data. The results show that larger obstacles and those with\n higher contrast are detected significantly faster. Obstacles that are\n approached at a higher speed were also detected significantly faster.\n However, varying the train protection system produced ambiguous results. The\n findings from this research provide a baseline for further research on train\n driver sensory capabilities and safety standard definition for future\n automation.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A challenge for automation in open track railway systems is the lack of
safety standards for obstacle detection and benchmarks for the performance
of automated systems. In this work, the foundation for such a benchmark was
established with the help of two studies aimed at understanding the reaction
time mechanisms of this task. A simulator experiment with professional train
drivers and an online study with a larger sample of non-train-drivers were
conducted to analyze the reaction time to obstacles along the tracks. The
size and contrast of the obstacles, as well as driving speed and use of
train protection systems, were varied in a within-subjects design and their
effects on reaction time were analyzed with a linear regression model on
log-transformed data. The results show that larger obstacles and those with
higher contrast are detected significantly faster. Obstacles that are
approached at a higher speed were also detected significantly faster.
However, varying the train protection system produced ambiguous results. The
findings from this research provide a baseline for further research on train
driver sensory capabilities and safety standard definition for future
automation.