Non-Deal Roadshows, Informed Trading, and Analyst Conflicts of Interest

D. Bradley, Russell Jame, Jared Williams
{"title":"Non-Deal Roadshows, Informed Trading, and Analyst Conflicts of Interest","authors":"D. Bradley, Russell Jame, Jared Williams","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3302687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-deal roadshows (NDRs) are private meetings between management and institutional investors, typically organized by sell-side analysts. We find that around NDRs, local institutional investors trade heavily and profitably, while retail trading is significantly less informed. Analysts who sponsor NDRs issue significantly more optimistic recommendations and target prices, coupled with more “beatable” earnings forecasts, consistent with analysts issuing strategically biased forecasts in order to win NDR business. Our results suggest that NDRs result in a substantial information advantage for institutional investors and create significant conflicts of interests for the analysts that organize them.","PeriodicalId":119201,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3302687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Non-deal roadshows (NDRs) are private meetings between management and institutional investors, typically organized by sell-side analysts. We find that around NDRs, local institutional investors trade heavily and profitably, while retail trading is significantly less informed. Analysts who sponsor NDRs issue significantly more optimistic recommendations and target prices, coupled with more “beatable” earnings forecasts, consistent with analysts issuing strategically biased forecasts in order to win NDR business. Our results suggest that NDRs result in a substantial information advantage for institutional investors and create significant conflicts of interests for the analysts that organize them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非交易路演,知情交易和分析师利益冲突
非交易路演(ndr)是管理层和机构投资者之间的私人会议,通常由卖方分析师组织。我们发现,围绕存托凭证,本地机构投资者进行了大量且有利可图的交易,而散户投资者的知情程度明显较低。赞助NDR的分析师给出了更为乐观的建议和目标价,同时给出了更为“可战胜”的盈利预测,这与分析师为了赢得NDR业务而发布的有战略偏见的预测相一致。我们的研究结果表明,ndr为机构投资者带来了实质性的信息优势,并为组织它们的分析师带来了重大的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality and Pricing Decisions for Reward-based Crowdfunding: Effects of Moral Hazard Punish Underperformance with Resting Optimal Dynamic Contracts in the Presence of Switching Cost A reconsideration of the Rothschild-Stiglitz insurance market model by information theory Learning from Law Enforcement Pulp Friction: The Value of Quantity Contracts in Decentralized Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1