Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time

P. Hall
{"title":"Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time","authors":"P. Hall","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199662814.013.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues for the value of seeing politics as a process that is structured across space and time. A brief review of recent debates about redistribution illustrates the importance of structural features of politics but the limits of Schumpeterian models based on cross-sectional time series estimations that ascribe major outcomes to a small number of variables operating seamlessly across space and time. As an alternative, the viability of historical institutionalism is challenged by a second wave of work that sees institutions as instruments in the hands of actors and institutional transformation as the consequence of continuous incremental change. However, I argue that the core insight of this second wave, which is to see institutions as the product of social coalitions, is compatible with the view that history is structured into critical junctures and periods of stability, characterized by different types of politics, and opens up significant issues about how the politics of these periods are related. In addition to forming lists of causal variables, there is much to be gained by refining our overarching models of politics that focus on interactions among those variables and how they are structured over space and time.","PeriodicalId":255414,"journal":{"name":"046 - Qualitative Methods","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"046 - Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199662814.013.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

This paper argues for the value of seeing politics as a process that is structured across space and time. A brief review of recent debates about redistribution illustrates the importance of structural features of politics but the limits of Schumpeterian models based on cross-sectional time series estimations that ascribe major outcomes to a small number of variables operating seamlessly across space and time. As an alternative, the viability of historical institutionalism is challenged by a second wave of work that sees institutions as instruments in the hands of actors and institutional transformation as the consequence of continuous incremental change. However, I argue that the core insight of this second wave, which is to see institutions as the product of social coalitions, is compatible with the view that history is structured into critical junctures and periods of stability, characterized by different types of politics, and opens up significant issues about how the politics of these periods are related. In addition to forming lists of causal variables, there is much to be gained by refining our overarching models of politics that focus on interactions among those variables and how they are structured over space and time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治是一个在空间和时间中结构化的过程
本文主张将政治视为一个跨越空间和时间结构的过程的价值。对最近关于再分配的辩论的简要回顾说明了政治结构特征的重要性,但基于横截面时间序列估计的熊彼特模型的局限性,该模型将主要结果归因于跨越空间和时间无缝运行的少数变量。作为另一种选择,历史制度主义的可行性受到第二波工作的挑战,这些工作将制度视为行动者手中的工具,将制度转型视为持续增量变化的结果。然而,我认为,第二次浪潮的核心见解,即将制度视为社会联盟的产物,与历史被构建为关键节点和稳定时期的观点是相容的,这些观点以不同类型的政治为特征,并开启了这些时期的政治如何相关的重要问题。除了形成因果变量列表之外,通过改进我们的总体政治模型,我们还可以获得很多东西,这些模型关注这些变量之间的相互作用,以及它们在空间和时间上的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1