Comparison between Bolton analysis and Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy

Syeda Shamal, S. Shaheed, J. Khan
{"title":"Comparison between Bolton analysis and Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy","authors":"Syeda Shamal, S. Shaheed, J. Khan","doi":"10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bolton分析法与Chu简化法计算前牙尺寸差异的比较
目的:比较Chu简化法与Bolton法计算前牙尺寸差异的准确性。材料与方法:对巴基斯坦白沙瓦Rehman牙科学院正畸科接受固定正畸治疗的58例未经治疗的正畸患者的牙模进行研究。结果:Chu测定前牙大小差异的方法与Bolton测定前牙大小差异的方法相比存在高估,平均差异为2.33±1.3mm。差异有高度统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:Chu法不能作为Bolton法的准确临床替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison Of Different Imaging Software For Measuring Volume Of The Maxillary Sinus Splint-Supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Class II Intermaxillary elastics For The Correction Of Class II Malocclusion ; A Retrospective Study Effect Of White Spot Lesion Pretreatment With Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared To Diode Laser On The Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Brackets. An In-Vitro Study Association Of Soft Tissue Facial Form & Dental Arch Form: A Cross Sectional Comparative Study Association Of Molar Angulation With Anterior Crowding And Dental Inclinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1