{"title":"Comparison between Bolton analysis and Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy","authors":"Syeda Shamal, S. Shaheed, J. Khan","doi":"10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.