Different Strokes: Spanish Policy toward Cuba and Equatorial Guinea during the Colonial Period

D. Aworawo
{"title":"Different Strokes: Spanish Policy toward Cuba and Equatorial Guinea during the Colonial Period","authors":"D. Aworawo","doi":"10.4314/LHR.V7I1.32555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spanish policy toward Cuba and Equatorial Guinea up to the end of the 19th century differed markedly. The policy itself is difficult to define but the general principle emphasized the exploitation of the resources of the colonies for the benefit of Spain. It also provided for the spread of Spanish culture and the Christian faith. It is therefore somewhat similar to the French assimilation policy. The emphasis on the economic benefits derivable from the colonies influenced Spain to pay attention to the development of infrastructure and establishment of effective administration in Cuba. This was very different from the situation in Equatorial Guinea. Since Equatorial Guinea did not hold much economically, Spanish policy toward the colony up to the early 20th century provided for the maintenance of loose control over the territory and very little effort was made to establish infrastructure and promote development. The article undertakes a comparative analysis of the experiences of Cuba and Equatorial Guinea under Spanish rule. It argues that although the focus of Spanish colonialism in Cuba, as elsewhere, was the exploitation of minerals and the development of plantation agriculture, the Spanish authorities established administrative structures and social infrastructure in the process. This was however not the case in Equatorial Guinea until the loss of Cuba in 1898 compelled Spain to turn attention to its African colony. The paper therefore disagrees with the view that the primary motive of colonial enterprise was to bring ‘civilisation' to the colonised, and concludes that the economic benefit to Spain was the most important consideration in the colonial enterprise, as was the case with most other colonial powers in Africa and elsewhere. Lagos Historical Review Vol. 7 2007: pp. 57-72","PeriodicalId":339050,"journal":{"name":"Lagos Historical Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lagos Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LHR.V7I1.32555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Spanish policy toward Cuba and Equatorial Guinea up to the end of the 19th century differed markedly. The policy itself is difficult to define but the general principle emphasized the exploitation of the resources of the colonies for the benefit of Spain. It also provided for the spread of Spanish culture and the Christian faith. It is therefore somewhat similar to the French assimilation policy. The emphasis on the economic benefits derivable from the colonies influenced Spain to pay attention to the development of infrastructure and establishment of effective administration in Cuba. This was very different from the situation in Equatorial Guinea. Since Equatorial Guinea did not hold much economically, Spanish policy toward the colony up to the early 20th century provided for the maintenance of loose control over the territory and very little effort was made to establish infrastructure and promote development. The article undertakes a comparative analysis of the experiences of Cuba and Equatorial Guinea under Spanish rule. It argues that although the focus of Spanish colonialism in Cuba, as elsewhere, was the exploitation of minerals and the development of plantation agriculture, the Spanish authorities established administrative structures and social infrastructure in the process. This was however not the case in Equatorial Guinea until the loss of Cuba in 1898 compelled Spain to turn attention to its African colony. The paper therefore disagrees with the view that the primary motive of colonial enterprise was to bring ‘civilisation' to the colonised, and concludes that the economic benefit to Spain was the most important consideration in the colonial enterprise, as was the case with most other colonial powers in Africa and elsewhere. Lagos Historical Review Vol. 7 2007: pp. 57-72
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的笔触:殖民时期西班牙对古巴和赤道几内亚的政策
直到19世纪末,西班牙对古巴和赤道几内亚的政策明显不同。该政策本身很难界定,但其总原则强调为西班牙的利益而开发殖民地的资源。它还为西班牙文化和基督教信仰的传播提供了条件。因此,这与法国的同化政策有些相似。强调从殖民地获得的经济利益,影响了西班牙注意在古巴发展基础设施和建立有效的行政管理。这与赤道几内亚的情况大不相同。由于赤道几内亚在经济上的地位不高,直到20世纪初,西班牙对该殖民地的政策都是维持对该领土的松散控制,很少努力建立基础设施和促进发展。本文对古巴和赤道几内亚在西班牙统治下的经历进行了比较分析。它认为,虽然西班牙在古巴的殖民主义和在其他地方一样,重点是开采矿物和发展种植园农业,但西班牙当局在这一过程中建立了行政结构和社会基础设施。然而,赤道几内亚的情况并非如此,直到1898年失去古巴迫使西班牙将注意力转向其非洲殖民地。因此,本文不同意殖民企业的主要动机是为被殖民者带来“文明”的观点,并得出结论,西班牙的经济利益是殖民企业中最重要的考虑因素,就像大多数其他殖民国家在非洲和其他地方的情况一样。拉各斯历史评论2007年7卷:第57-72页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inventing tradition in central Nigeria: a study of changing political institutions among the Igede, 1900 – 1976 Human lorries: carriers in the British Southern Cameroon’s economy and re-ordering of road communications, 1916 – c.1955 Book Review: Securing Peace: State-Building and Economic Development in Post-Conflict Countries The importance of inter-modal transport system in Nigeria with reference to the Asaba-Onitsha transport corridor since the pre-colonial period The development of national trunk roads in Nigeria, 1960 2013
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1