R. Billones, Carlos Matthew P. Cases, Tanya V. Olegario, R. R. Vicerra, N. Bugtai, E. Dadios
{"title":"A Systematic Evaluation of the Philippine Innovation Ecosystem","authors":"R. Billones, Carlos Matthew P. Cases, Tanya V. Olegario, R. R. Vicerra, N. Bugtai, E. Dadios","doi":"10.1109/HNICEM51456.2020.9400074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While innovative ideas are the basis for most startup companies, a prolific and supportive innovation ecosystem is needed for these ideas to come to fruition. A systematic method to properly determine and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a particular innovation ecosystem must be achieved. This research study presents a systematic evaluation of the Philippines' innovation ecosystem based on Oxentia's guide for evaluating a typical entrepreneurial ecosystem known as “The Elements Review”. This guide lists each element to be evaluated and grouped it into four areas: 1) Universities, 2) Government, 3) Businesses, and 4) the Third Sector. The original “Elements Review” used a color descriptor system to visualize the state of the innovation ecosystem. This research study proposed a number rating system to replace the color descriptor system. Each element was given a rating between 1 to 3. A rating of “1” is the lowest performance, while a rating of “3” is the highest performance. The average scores for each element area are Universities/RTOs = 2.33, Government = 2.4, Businesses/Industry = 2.5, and the Third Sector = 1.4.","PeriodicalId":230810,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM51456.2020.9400074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
While innovative ideas are the basis for most startup companies, a prolific and supportive innovation ecosystem is needed for these ideas to come to fruition. A systematic method to properly determine and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a particular innovation ecosystem must be achieved. This research study presents a systematic evaluation of the Philippines' innovation ecosystem based on Oxentia's guide for evaluating a typical entrepreneurial ecosystem known as “The Elements Review”. This guide lists each element to be evaluated and grouped it into four areas: 1) Universities, 2) Government, 3) Businesses, and 4) the Third Sector. The original “Elements Review” used a color descriptor system to visualize the state of the innovation ecosystem. This research study proposed a number rating system to replace the color descriptor system. Each element was given a rating between 1 to 3. A rating of “1” is the lowest performance, while a rating of “3” is the highest performance. The average scores for each element area are Universities/RTOs = 2.33, Government = 2.4, Businesses/Industry = 2.5, and the Third Sector = 1.4.