Puerto Rico and the Right of Accession

Joseph Blocher, G. Gulati
{"title":"Puerto Rico and the Right of Accession","authors":"Joseph Blocher, G. Gulati","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2988102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On June 11, 2017, Puerto Rico held a referendum on its legal status. Although turnout was low, 97% of ballots favored statehood over independence or the status quo. The federal government, however, has financial and political reasons to resist this preference: Puerto Rico would bring with it a massive, unpayable debt, and the potential to swing the current balance of power in Congress. The tension between Puerto Rico’s possible desire to pull closer to the mainland and Congress’s presumptive desire to hold it at arm’s length raises at least two important legal questions. Could Congress expel Puerto Rico by giving it “independence” against its will? Conversely, do the people of Puerto Rico have a right of “accession” to statehood, even if Congress does not act? \nThe answers are not obvious. International law, we argue, suggests that the people of Puerto Rico have a legal right to determine their own status vis-a-vis the mainland. Whether domestic law protects the same right of self determination is a more difficult question.","PeriodicalId":171535,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Rights & Liberties (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Rights & Liberties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2988102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On June 11, 2017, Puerto Rico held a referendum on its legal status. Although turnout was low, 97% of ballots favored statehood over independence or the status quo. The federal government, however, has financial and political reasons to resist this preference: Puerto Rico would bring with it a massive, unpayable debt, and the potential to swing the current balance of power in Congress. The tension between Puerto Rico’s possible desire to pull closer to the mainland and Congress’s presumptive desire to hold it at arm’s length raises at least two important legal questions. Could Congress expel Puerto Rico by giving it “independence” against its will? Conversely, do the people of Puerto Rico have a right of “accession” to statehood, even if Congress does not act? The answers are not obvious. International law, we argue, suggests that the people of Puerto Rico have a legal right to determine their own status vis-a-vis the mainland. Whether domestic law protects the same right of self determination is a more difficult question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波多黎各和加入的权利
2017年6月11日,波多黎各就其法律地位举行全民公投。尽管投票率很低,但97%的选票支持成为一个州,而不是独立或维持现状。然而,联邦政府有财政和政治上的理由抵制这种偏好:波多黎各将带来巨大的、无法偿还的债务,并有可能改变目前国会的权力平衡。波多黎各可能希望靠近美国大陆,而国会可能希望与之保持一定距离,两者之间的紧张关系至少引发了两个重要的法律问题。国会会违背波多黎各的意愿,给予它“独立”,从而驱逐它吗?反之,即使国会不采取行动,波多黎各人民是否有权“加入”成为美国的一个州?答案并不明显。我们认为,国际法表明,波多黎各人民有合法权利决定他们自己相对于大陆的地位。国内法是否保护同样的自决权是一个比较困难的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Coronavirus Pandemic Shutdown and Distributive Justice: Why Courts Should Refocus the Fifth Amendment Takings Analysis Curative Measures & Regulations by the Nigerian Government Amid COVID-19 Outbreak vis a vis the Fundamental Human Rights of Its Citizen and Matters Arising Therein Bring On the Pettifoggers: Revisiting the Ethics Rules, Civil Gideon, and the Role of the Judiciary A Consumer Protection Approach to Platform Content Moderation Amicus Curiae Brief of Tax Law Professors in Support of Appellees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1