Engineering design factors: how broadly do students define problems?

Laura L. Bogusch, J. Turns, C. Atman
{"title":"Engineering design factors: how broadly do students define problems?","authors":"Laura L. Bogusch, J. Turns, C. Atman","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preparation of students for design problem solving is an important aspect of engineering education. While it may appear obvious that senior engineering students will be more adept at solving design problems than freshmen engineering students, this perceived progress should be measured and quantified. Analysis of the factors a student considers when approaching an engineering design problem will provide a means of measuring and quantifying the differences of the abilities of students. A study was conducted in which 93 engineering students (both freshmen and seniors) were asked to list the factors one would consider in solving a particular large scale engineering design problem. The responses of the students were videotaped and then transcribed. Two coding schemes were developed to categorize the statements that students made while discussing design factors, first by physical location of the topic of the factor, and secondly by the frame of reference in which the factor is mentioned. In this paper, the transcribed responses of 25 students are described and discussed within the framework of the two categorization schemes. The goal of this preliminary analysis was to validate the coding scheme that will be applied to the full data set.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

The preparation of students for design problem solving is an important aspect of engineering education. While it may appear obvious that senior engineering students will be more adept at solving design problems than freshmen engineering students, this perceived progress should be measured and quantified. Analysis of the factors a student considers when approaching an engineering design problem will provide a means of measuring and quantifying the differences of the abilities of students. A study was conducted in which 93 engineering students (both freshmen and seniors) were asked to list the factors one would consider in solving a particular large scale engineering design problem. The responses of the students were videotaped and then transcribed. Two coding schemes were developed to categorize the statements that students made while discussing design factors, first by physical location of the topic of the factor, and secondly by the frame of reference in which the factor is mentioned. In this paper, the transcribed responses of 25 students are described and discussed within the framework of the two categorization schemes. The goal of this preliminary analysis was to validate the coding scheme that will be applied to the full data set.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程设计因素:学生对问题的定义有多宽泛?
培养学生解决设计问题的能力是工程教育的一个重要方面。虽然看起来很明显,大四的工程专业学生比大一的工程专业学生更擅长解决设计问题,但这种感知到的进步应该被衡量和量化。分析学生在处理工程设计问题时所考虑的因素,将提供一种测量和量化学生能力差异的方法。在一项研究中,93名工程专业的学生(包括大一和大四的学生)被要求列出在解决一个特定的大型工程设计问题时会考虑的因素。学生们的回答被录下来,然后转录。开发了两种编码方案来对学生在讨论设计因素时所做的陈述进行分类,首先是根据因素主题的物理位置,其次是根据提及因素的参考框架。本文在两种分类方案的框架内对25名学生的转录反应进行了描述和讨论。这个初步分析的目的是验证将应用于完整数据集的编码方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Design TASC Engineering Design Competition: a ten-year perspective Concept questions for improved learning and outcome assessment in statics Different is good: barriers to retention for women in software engineering What are we really evaluating? Building the next generation of high performance computing researchers in engineering and science: the NCSA/ARL MSRC PET summer internship program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1