Asset Forfeiture and Third Party Rights: The Need for Further Law Reform

Michael Goldsmith, M. Linderman
{"title":"Asset Forfeiture and Third Party Rights: The Need for Further Law Reform","authors":"Michael Goldsmith, M. Linderman","doi":"10.2307/1372518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asset forfeiture has become an important weapon in the fight against narcotics trafficking and racketeering. ... Pearson addressed the constitutionality of Puerto Rico's civil forfeiture statute. ... Who had standing to assert it? For example, would a reasonable precautions defense be available to a bona fide purchaser who paid full value for a conveyance and neither knew, nor had reason to know, of any prior illegal use? Similarly, would the defense be available to a lienholder acting reasonably without knowledge of any impropriety? Such third party claimants seem to deserve more protection than an owner because they generally lack any opportunity to prevent illegal use of the conveyance. ... In 1970 Congress provided for criminal forfeiture in the newly enacted CCE and RICO statutes. CCE authorized forfeiture of assets linked to drug trafficking, and RICO extended asset forfeiture beyond narcotics trafficking to other racketeering activities as defined in the statute. ... By adopting a negligence test instead of some higher standard or one that distinguishes between types of third party claims, Congress has failed to adequately protect the third party interest. ...","PeriodicalId":297504,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1372518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Asset forfeiture has become an important weapon in the fight against narcotics trafficking and racketeering. ... Pearson addressed the constitutionality of Puerto Rico's civil forfeiture statute. ... Who had standing to assert it? For example, would a reasonable precautions defense be available to a bona fide purchaser who paid full value for a conveyance and neither knew, nor had reason to know, of any prior illegal use? Similarly, would the defense be available to a lienholder acting reasonably without knowledge of any impropriety? Such third party claimants seem to deserve more protection than an owner because they generally lack any opportunity to prevent illegal use of the conveyance. ... In 1970 Congress provided for criminal forfeiture in the newly enacted CCE and RICO statutes. CCE authorized forfeiture of assets linked to drug trafficking, and RICO extended asset forfeiture beyond narcotics trafficking to other racketeering activities as defined in the statute. ... By adopting a negligence test instead of some higher standard or one that distinguishes between types of third party claims, Congress has failed to adequately protect the third party interest. ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资产没收与第三人权利:进一步法律改革的必要性
没收资产已成为打击贩毒和敲诈勒索的重要武器. ...皮尔逊谈到了波多黎各民事没收法规. ...的合宪性谁有资格主张呢?例如,一个善意的购买者支付了运输工具的全部价值,但既不知道,也没有理由知道,之前有任何非法使用,他是否可以为合理的预防措施辩护?同样,在不知道任何不当行为的情况下合理行事的留置权人是否也可以使用该抗辩?此类第三方索赔人似乎比所有权人更应得到保护,因为他们通常没有任何机会防止非法使用转让. ...1970年,国会在新颁布的CCE和RICO法规中规定了刑事没收。CCE授权没收与贩毒有关的资产,RICO将资产没收范围从贩毒扩大到法规. ...中定义的其他敲诈勒索活动通过采用过失检验而不是采用某种更高的标准或区分第三方索赔类型的标准,国会未能充分保护第三方利益. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chevron as a Voting Rule Health Insurance Exchanges in Health Care Reform Legal and Policy Issues Equitable Balancing in the Age of Statutes Creating a Template for Banking Insolvency Law Reform after the Collapse of Northern Rock Unjust Laws and Illegal Norms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1