From Canada to Brazil: a Model of Society's Participation in Communication Policy Debate?

E. Rebouças
{"title":"From Canada to Brazil: a Model of Society's Participation in Communication Policy Debate?","authors":"E. Rebouças","doi":"10.18192/cjmsrcem.v16i1.6455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study observes and analyses how Canada and Brazil are experiencing similar situations with respect to communications issues. Understanding that public hearings are the ideal locus for debating specific public policies, the Royal Commissions of Inquiry targeted at the cultural and media industries sectors were chosen as corpus for analysis. The intention here is to do more than merely describe those commissions’ activities; instead, it is to explore their unfolding, attempting to identify the interplay of the relations and interests involved. This study adopts the theoretical perspectives of Political Economy of Communications and of Cultural and Media Industries. The article proposal assumes that the Canadian model of public hearings might be applied to Brazil. Its conclusions indicate a crisis in which society in general has no interest in joining debates on media-related issues, reflecting the State’s failure to defend the public interest and a strong private lobby to influence those debates results.","PeriodicalId":401869,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Media Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/cjmsrcem.v16i1.6455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study observes and analyses how Canada and Brazil are experiencing similar situations with respect to communications issues. Understanding that public hearings are the ideal locus for debating specific public policies, the Royal Commissions of Inquiry targeted at the cultural and media industries sectors were chosen as corpus for analysis. The intention here is to do more than merely describe those commissions’ activities; instead, it is to explore their unfolding, attempting to identify the interplay of the relations and interests involved. This study adopts the theoretical perspectives of Political Economy of Communications and of Cultural and Media Industries. The article proposal assumes that the Canadian model of public hearings might be applied to Brazil. Its conclusions indicate a crisis in which society in general has no interest in joining debates on media-related issues, reflecting the State’s failure to defend the public interest and a strong private lobby to influence those debates results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从加拿大到巴西:社会参与传播政策辩论的典范?
本研究观察和分析了加拿大和巴西在通信问题方面的类似情况。考虑到公开听证会是讨论具体公共政策的理想场所,我们选择了针对文化和媒体行业部门的皇家调查委员会作为分析的主体。这里的意图不仅仅是描述这些委员会的活动;相反,它是探索它们的展开,试图确定所涉及的关系和利益的相互作用。本研究采用传播政治经济学和文化传媒产业的理论视角。这条建议假定加拿大的公开听证模式可能适用于巴西。报告的结论表明,社会普遍没有兴趣参加有关媒体问题的辩论,这反映出国家未能捍卫公众利益,以及一个强大的私人游说团体试图影响这些辩论的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“We Support Harm Reduction”: Frame Analysis of Canadian News Media Coverage of the Opioid Crisis Les relations entre le diffuseur public canadien CBC et les producteurs indépendants. Analyse d’une filière audiovisuelle en transformation Instagram as a Tool to Counter the Image of Countries as Unsafe: the Case of #LiveLoveLebanon A Plea for the Preservation of Early BASIC Game Programs Langue et identité chez les joueurs franco-ontariens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1