ASSESSMENT METHODS USED BY MATHEMATICS AND ARABIC LANGUAGE TEACHERS IN MEASURING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS WITH MILD MENTAL DISABILITIES (DOWN SYNDROME) IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN THE NORTHERN GOVERNORATES – PALESTINE

Ayyoub Mousa OLYAN
{"title":"ASSESSMENT METHODS USED BY MATHEMATICS AND ARABIC LANGUAGE TEACHERS IN MEASURING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS WITH MILD MENTAL DISABILITIES (DOWN SYNDROME) IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN THE NORTHERN GOVERNORATES – PALESTINE","authors":"Ayyoub Mousa OLYAN","doi":"10.47832/2757-5403.18.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to reveal the level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates, and to identify the difference in the estimates of the study sample members about the level of assessment methods used by teachers of my subjects. Mathematics and the Arabic language in measuring the achievement of students with simple mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates according to the study variables: gender, specialization, educational qualification, number of years of experience The researchers used the descriptive analytical method, and the study population consisted of all the teachers of mathematics and Arabic language in public schools in the northern governorates / Palestine, who numbered (140) teachers, and the study sample included (119) teachers, i.e. a percentage of (85%) of the study population, and the researchers used the questionnaire tool prepared by them. The study reached the following results: 1. The level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates came to a high degree, with a percentage of (82.2%). 2. There are no differences in the average level of assessment methods used by teachers of mathematics and Arabic language in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the gender variable. 3. There are no differences in the average level of assessment methods used by teachers of mathematics and Arabic language in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the variable of specialization. 4. There are no differences in the average level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the educational qualification variable. 5. There are differences in the level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the variable number of years of experience, and that the differences in the total score were between (less than 5 years) and (more than 10 years) in favor of (less than 5 years), and between (5-10 years) and (more than 10 years) in favor of (5-10 years).","PeriodicalId":182370,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.18.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to reveal the level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates, and to identify the difference in the estimates of the study sample members about the level of assessment methods used by teachers of my subjects. Mathematics and the Arabic language in measuring the achievement of students with simple mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates according to the study variables: gender, specialization, educational qualification, number of years of experience The researchers used the descriptive analytical method, and the study population consisted of all the teachers of mathematics and Arabic language in public schools in the northern governorates / Palestine, who numbered (140) teachers, and the study sample included (119) teachers, i.e. a percentage of (85%) of the study population, and the researchers used the questionnaire tool prepared by them. The study reached the following results: 1. The level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates came to a high degree, with a percentage of (82.2%). 2. There are no differences in the average level of assessment methods used by teachers of mathematics and Arabic language in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the gender variable. 3. There are no differences in the average level of assessment methods used by teachers of mathematics and Arabic language in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the variable of specialization. 4. There are no differences in the average level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the educational qualification variable. 5. There are differences in the level of assessment methods used by mathematics and Arabic language teachers in measuring the achievement of students with mild mental disabilities (Down syndrome) in public schools in the northern governorates due to the variable number of years of experience, and that the differences in the total score were between (less than 5 years) and (more than 10 years) in favor of (less than 5 years), and between (5-10 years) and (more than 10 years) in favor of (5-10 years).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴勒斯坦北部省份公立学校数学和阿拉伯语教师用于衡量轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生成绩的评估方法
该研究旨在揭示北部省份公立学校数学和阿拉伯语教师在衡量轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生成绩时使用的评估方法水平,并确定研究样本成员对我的科目教师使用的评估方法水平的估计差异。根据研究变量,将数学和阿拉伯语用于衡量北部各省公立学校中患有简单智力残疾(唐氏综合症)的学生的成绩:研究人员采用描述性分析方法,研究人群由北部省份/巴勒斯坦公立学校的所有数学和阿拉伯语教师组成,人数为(140)名教师,研究样本包括(119)名教师,即研究人群的百分比(85%),研究人员使用他们准备的问卷调查工具。研究得出以下结论:1。北部省份公立学校数学和阿拉伯语教师在衡量轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生成绩时使用的评估方法水平很高,占82.2%。2. 由于性别变量,数学和阿拉伯语教师在衡量北部各省公立学校轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生的成绩时所使用的评估方法的平均水平没有差异。3.由于专业化这一变量,数学和阿拉伯语教师在衡量北部各省公立学校轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生成绩时所使用的评估方法的平均水平没有差异。4. 由于教育资格变量,数学和阿拉伯语教师在衡量北部各省公立学校轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生成绩时所使用的评估方法的平均水平没有差异。5. 由于经验年数不同,北部省份公立学校的数学和阿拉伯语教师在衡量轻度精神残疾(唐氏综合症)学生成绩时所使用的评估方法水平存在差异,而且总分的差异在(少于5年)和(超过10年)之间,有利于(少于5年)。在(5-10年)和(10年以上)之间支持(5-10年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE PHONETIC MANIFESTATIONS OF SHEIKH ABU ABD AL-RAHMAN ALDARIR AL-HIRI AL-NAYSABURI (D. 430 AH) IN HIS BOOK: AL-KIFAYA FI ALTAFSIR SEVER DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS. A STUDY IN CONCEPT AND EFFECTS THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITY IN PROVIDING THEIR STUDENT WITH LEADERSHIP SKILLS IN THE SULTANATE OF OMAN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FISCAL POLICY IN ATTRACTING FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT(LIBYA CASE STUDY) THE ROLE OF DOCUMENTARY FILMS AT AL JAZEERA T.V CHANNEL IN PROVIDING JORDANIAN POLITICAL ELITES WITH KNOWLEDGE/ A SURVEY STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1