A qualitative study of illness identity: schizophrenia and depression

Namino Ottewell
{"title":"A qualitative study of illness identity: schizophrenia and depression","authors":"Namino Ottewell","doi":"10.4081/QRMH.2018.7420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Illness identity refers to the interpretation of having mental illness in persons who regard themselves as mentally ill. Illness identity can impact people diagnosed with mental illness negatively. However, little is known about the background of illness identity. This study aimed to investigate the process whereby mental health service users accept their diagnosis and develop an illness identity and to compare the processes between schizophrenia and depression. Twenty persons with schizophrenia and depression were interviewed, and the data were analysed using grounded theory approach. The major findings were as follows: i) while those with schizophrenia were shocked by their diagnosis and took time to accept it, this was not true for those with depression; ii) for participants with depression, it was relatively easy to accept their diagnosis, as they thought that depression was a normal illness; participants with schizophrenia needed to learn about their illness, know the efficacy of psychiatric medication and reduce their prejudice against mental illness to accept their diagnosis; and iii) participants’ illness identity encompassed sickness and normality with sickness being related to taking psychiatric medication and normality being associated with having regular work, acting as other people do or living in the community. These findings suggest the influence of social attitudes to each illness on illness identity and the complex nature of illness identity.","PeriodicalId":375726,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/QRMH.2018.7420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Illness identity refers to the interpretation of having mental illness in persons who regard themselves as mentally ill. Illness identity can impact people diagnosed with mental illness negatively. However, little is known about the background of illness identity. This study aimed to investigate the process whereby mental health service users accept their diagnosis and develop an illness identity and to compare the processes between schizophrenia and depression. Twenty persons with schizophrenia and depression were interviewed, and the data were analysed using grounded theory approach. The major findings were as follows: i) while those with schizophrenia were shocked by their diagnosis and took time to accept it, this was not true for those with depression; ii) for participants with depression, it was relatively easy to accept their diagnosis, as they thought that depression was a normal illness; participants with schizophrenia needed to learn about their illness, know the efficacy of psychiatric medication and reduce their prejudice against mental illness to accept their diagnosis; and iii) participants’ illness identity encompassed sickness and normality with sickness being related to taking psychiatric medication and normality being associated with having regular work, acting as other people do or living in the community. These findings suggest the influence of social attitudes to each illness on illness identity and the complex nature of illness identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疾病认同的定性研究:精神分裂症和抑郁症
疾病认同是指认为自己患有精神疾病的人对患有精神疾病的解释。疾病身份会对被诊断患有精神疾病的人产生负面影响。然而,人们对疾病身份的背景知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨心理健康服务使用者接受其诊断并发展疾病认同的过程,并比较精神分裂症和抑郁症的过程。对20名精神分裂症和抑郁症患者进行访谈,并采用扎根理论方法对数据进行分析。主要发现如下:1)精神分裂症患者对自己的诊断结果感到震惊,并需要时间来接受它,而抑郁症患者却并非如此;Ii)对于患有抑郁症的参与者来说,相对容易接受他们的诊断,因为他们认为抑郁症是一种正常的疾病;精神分裂症患者需要了解自己的疾病,了解精神药物的疗效,减少对精神疾病的偏见,才能接受诊断;iii)参与者的疾病身份包括疾病和正常,疾病与服用精神药物有关,正常与有规律的工作、与其他人一样行事或生活在社区有关。这些发现表明社会对每种疾病的态度对疾病认同的影响以及疾病认同的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthcare providers’ narratives about interactionally troubling patient exchanges: Accounting for and against an active patient role Screen time, mute, mixed messages, and panic: An international auto-ethnographic study of knowledge workers during a pandemic Debating claims of fact in public health: A pedagogical activity Lessons learned from qualitative fieldwork in a multilingual setting A qualitative analysis and evaluation of social support received after experiencing a broken marriage engagement and impacts on holistic health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1