The Clinical Utility of Transient Elastography (TE) in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Decompensation in Cirrhosis

A. Al-Khazraji, J. Suri, A. Condella, S. Tewani, Ghazi A. Hussain, Z. Jiang, R. Malik
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of Transient Elastography (TE) in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Decompensation in Cirrhosis","authors":"A. Al-Khazraji, J. Suri, A. Condella, S. Tewani, Ghazi A. Hussain, Z. Jiang, R. Malik","doi":"10.15226/2374-815x/7/1/001140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transient Elastography (TE) is a non-invasive method providing reliable measurements help staging liver fibrosis which is crucial for both prognosis and management. In this study, we assess the utility of TE in predicting clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort 272 patients underwent serial TE measurements in a single liver center. TE scores at baseline and longitudinal change over time were correlated with the primary outcome of clinical decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleed, increase in CPC > 2, HCC, liver transplant, and death). Results: 162 patients (62%) had an initial TE score of < 12.5 kPa (non-cirrhotic) and 100 patients (38%) had a TE score of >12.5 kPa consistent with cirrhosis. In the cirrhosis group, mean TE score 26.4 kPa compared to 7.0 kPa non-cirrhosis (p < 0.0001). In the cirrhotic group, 85% had esophageal varices on upper endoscopy that had baseline TE score of ≥ 21.0 kPa in compare to 13% with baseline TE scores 12.5- 20.0kPa (p < 0.05). During a median follow-up period of 4.5 years, 14% of patients achieved a primary outcome of clinical decompensation [30% cirrhosis versus 4% non-cirrhosis (p < 0.01)]. Logistic regression analysis demonstrates that TE score of ≥35 kPa was the strongest predictor for primary endpoint OR 6.5 (95% CI 8.2 – 4.8, p < 0.01). An Annual increase in TE score of ≥8 kPa to the cirrhotic range ≥12.5 kPa was associated with a significant OR 2.8 (95% CI 2.1-3.9, p < 0.01) for developing clinical decompensation. Conclusion: Baseline TE scores ≥35kPa & annual increment TE score ≥8 kPa were associated with a significant risk of clinical decomposition. Key words: Transient elastography; liver fibrosis; Fibroscan; clinical decompensation;","PeriodicalId":365218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology, Pancreatology &amp; Liver Disorders","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology, Pancreatology &amp; Liver Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-815x/7/1/001140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transient Elastography (TE) is a non-invasive method providing reliable measurements help staging liver fibrosis which is crucial for both prognosis and management. In this study, we assess the utility of TE in predicting clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort 272 patients underwent serial TE measurements in a single liver center. TE scores at baseline and longitudinal change over time were correlated with the primary outcome of clinical decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleed, increase in CPC > 2, HCC, liver transplant, and death). Results: 162 patients (62%) had an initial TE score of < 12.5 kPa (non-cirrhotic) and 100 patients (38%) had a TE score of >12.5 kPa consistent with cirrhosis. In the cirrhosis group, mean TE score 26.4 kPa compared to 7.0 kPa non-cirrhosis (p < 0.0001). In the cirrhotic group, 85% had esophageal varices on upper endoscopy that had baseline TE score of ≥ 21.0 kPa in compare to 13% with baseline TE scores 12.5- 20.0kPa (p < 0.05). During a median follow-up period of 4.5 years, 14% of patients achieved a primary outcome of clinical decompensation [30% cirrhosis versus 4% non-cirrhosis (p < 0.01)]. Logistic regression analysis demonstrates that TE score of ≥35 kPa was the strongest predictor for primary endpoint OR 6.5 (95% CI 8.2 – 4.8, p < 0.01). An Annual increase in TE score of ≥8 kPa to the cirrhotic range ≥12.5 kPa was associated with a significant OR 2.8 (95% CI 2.1-3.9, p < 0.01) for developing clinical decompensation. Conclusion: Baseline TE scores ≥35kPa & annual increment TE score ≥8 kPa were associated with a significant risk of clinical decomposition. Key words: Transient elastography; liver fibrosis; Fibroscan; clinical decompensation;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瞬时弹性成像(TE)在预测肝硬化临床结局和失代偿中的临床应用
背景:瞬时弹性成像(TE)是一种非侵入性方法,提供可靠的测量方法,有助于肝纤维化分期,这对预后和治疗都至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了TE在预测临床结果方面的应用。方法:回顾性队列272例患者在单个肝脏中心进行了一系列TE测量。基线时的TE评分和随时间的纵向变化与临床失代偿的主要结局(腹水、脑病、静脉曲张出血、CPC升高> 2、HCC、肝移植和死亡)相关。结果:162例(62%)患者的初始TE评分< 12.5 kPa(非肝硬化),100例(38%)患者的TE评分>12.5 kPa(符合肝硬化)。肝硬化组TE平均评分26.4 kPa,而非肝硬化组TE平均评分为7.0 kPa (p < 0.0001)。在肝硬化组中,85%的患者在上内镜检查中发现基线TE评分≥21.0 kPa的食管静脉曲张,而基线TE评分12.5- 20.0kPa的患者为13% (p < 0.05)。在中位4.5年的随访期间,14%的患者实现了临床失代偿的主要结局[30%肝硬化对4%非肝硬化(p < 0.01)]。Logistic回归分析显示,TE评分≥35 kPa是主要终点OR 6.5的最强预测因子(95% CI 8.2 ~ 4.8, p < 0.01)。TE评分每年增加≥8kpa至肝硬化范围≥12.5 kPa与发生临床失代偿的显著OR为2.8 (95% CI 2.1-3.9, p < 0.01)相关。结论:基线TE评分≥35kPa和年增量TE评分≥8kpa与临床分解风险显著相关。关键词:瞬态弹性;肝纤维化;Fibroscan;临床呼吸困难;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Clinical Utility of Transient Elastography (TE) in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Decompensation in Cirrhosis Changes in Time in Yield of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Relation to the Applicants Speciality Rare Cause of Obstructive Jaundice in a Young Female Unusual Case of Simultaneous Acute Hepatitis and Acute Pancreatitis in a Bodybuilder Some Features of Intestinal Metaplasia in Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1