Democracy as a Curve: The Dynamic Effects of Democratization on Economic Growth

Henrique Alpalhão
{"title":"Democracy as a Curve: The Dynamic Effects of Democratization on Economic Growth","authors":"Henrique Alpalhão","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3160111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to model the relationship between economic growth and democratization, with an emphasis on non-linearities. I adopt and explore the concept of “political capital” as a measure of democracy, which is extremely uncommon in the literature and brings considerable advantages in dynamic terms. My results indicate that the impact of democratization on growth is significant and does vary according to the stage of democratic development each country is in, which is likely to be an important factor in explaining the academic dissonance regarding this topic. Broadly, I find that initial democratization enacts a stronger and positive change in economic performance, which then subsides until a level of near zero at the intermediate democracy level. For more evolved democracies, further democratization may impact growth negatively, negligibly or positively (albeit more weakly so than in the initial stages). Additionally, this relationship is found to be significant both when accounting for more and less direct effects of democracy. Results for the more direct avenue are more optimistic, implying that the indirect impacts of democracy on growth, as a whole, might be negative. For most estimations, a (minimum) level of democracy that maximizes growth is found, which I call the “democracy maximum”. My results suggest this occurs for a democracy level of, on a scale of 1 to 10, around or above 6.","PeriodicalId":117783,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper attempts to model the relationship between economic growth and democratization, with an emphasis on non-linearities. I adopt and explore the concept of “political capital” as a measure of democracy, which is extremely uncommon in the literature and brings considerable advantages in dynamic terms. My results indicate that the impact of democratization on growth is significant and does vary according to the stage of democratic development each country is in, which is likely to be an important factor in explaining the academic dissonance regarding this topic. Broadly, I find that initial democratization enacts a stronger and positive change in economic performance, which then subsides until a level of near zero at the intermediate democracy level. For more evolved democracies, further democratization may impact growth negatively, negligibly or positively (albeit more weakly so than in the initial stages). Additionally, this relationship is found to be significant both when accounting for more and less direct effects of democracy. Results for the more direct avenue are more optimistic, implying that the indirect impacts of democracy on growth, as a whole, might be negative. For most estimations, a (minimum) level of democracy that maximizes growth is found, which I call the “democracy maximum”. My results suggest this occurs for a democracy level of, on a scale of 1 to 10, around or above 6.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为曲线的民主:民主化对经济增长的动态影响
本文试图建立经济增长与民主化之间关系的模型,重点是非线性。我采用并探讨了“政治资本”的概念作为民主的衡量标准,这在文献中是极为罕见的,并且在动态方面具有相当大的优势。我的研究结果表明,民主化对经济增长的影响是显著的,并且确实根据每个国家所处的民主发展阶段而有所不同,这可能是解释关于这一主题的学术失调的重要因素。总的来说,我发现最初的民主化在经济表现上产生了更强、更积极的变化,然后这种变化在中间民主水平上消退,直到接近零的水平。对于更发达的民主国家来说,进一步的民主化对经济增长的影响可能是消极的,可以忽略不计的,也可能是积极的(尽管比最初阶段的影响更弱)。此外,这种关系在考虑民主的直接影响或多或少时都很重要。更直接途径的结果更为乐观,这意味着民主对整体增长的间接影响可能是负面的。对于大多数估计,找到了使增长最大化的(最低)民主水平,我称之为“民主最大值”。我的研究结果表明,这种情况发生在民主水平为1到10的国家,在6左右或以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Apartheid Crises, Catharses, and Boiling Frogs: Path Dependence in Collective Action The Common Good and Voter Polarization Voting for Compromises: Alternative Voting Methods in Polarized Societies Influência de Messias? Relação Intramunicipal entre Preferências Políticas e Mortes em uma Pandemia (Messias’ Influence? Intra-Municipal Relationship between Political Preferences and Deaths in a Pandemic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1