Challenging Geostatistical Methods To Represent Heterogeneity in CO2 Reservoirs Under Residual Trapping

J. Damico, R. Ritzi, N. Gershenzon, Roland Okwen
{"title":"Challenging Geostatistical Methods To Represent Heterogeneity in CO2 Reservoirs Under Residual Trapping","authors":"J. Damico, R. Ritzi, N. Gershenzon, Roland Okwen","doi":"10.2113/EEG-2116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geostatistical methods based on two-point spatial-bivariate statistics have been used to model heterogeneity within computational studies of the dispersion of contaminants in groundwater reservoirs and the trapping of CO2 in geosequestration reservoirs. The ability of these methods to represent fluvial architecture, commonly occurring in such reservoirs, has been questioned. We challenged a widely used two-point spatial-bivariate statistical method to represent fluvial heterogeneity in the context of representing how reservoir heterogeneity affects residual trapping of CO2 injected for geosequestration. A more rigorous model for fluvial architecture was used as the benchmark in these studies. Both the geostatistically generated model and the benchmark model were interrogated, and metrics for the connectivity of high-permeability preferential flow pathways were quantified. Computational simulations of CO2 injection were performed, and metrics for CO2 dynamics and trapping were quantified. All metrics were similar between the two models. The percentage of high-permeability cells in spanning connected clusters (percolating clusters) was similar because percolation is strongly dependent upon proportions, and the same proportion of higher permeability cross-strata was specified in generating both models. The CO2 plume dynamics and residual trapping metrics were similar because they are largely controlled by the occurrence of percolating clusters. The benchmark model represented more features of the fluvial architecture and, depending on context, representing those features may be quite important, but the simpler geostatistical model was able to adequately represent fluvial reservoir architecture within the context and within the scope of the parameters represented here.","PeriodicalId":138906,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Engineering Geoscience","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Engineering Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-2116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Geostatistical methods based on two-point spatial-bivariate statistics have been used to model heterogeneity within computational studies of the dispersion of contaminants in groundwater reservoirs and the trapping of CO2 in geosequestration reservoirs. The ability of these methods to represent fluvial architecture, commonly occurring in such reservoirs, has been questioned. We challenged a widely used two-point spatial-bivariate statistical method to represent fluvial heterogeneity in the context of representing how reservoir heterogeneity affects residual trapping of CO2 injected for geosequestration. A more rigorous model for fluvial architecture was used as the benchmark in these studies. Both the geostatistically generated model and the benchmark model were interrogated, and metrics for the connectivity of high-permeability preferential flow pathways were quantified. Computational simulations of CO2 injection were performed, and metrics for CO2 dynamics and trapping were quantified. All metrics were similar between the two models. The percentage of high-permeability cells in spanning connected clusters (percolating clusters) was similar because percolation is strongly dependent upon proportions, and the same proportion of higher permeability cross-strata was specified in generating both models. The CO2 plume dynamics and residual trapping metrics were similar because they are largely controlled by the occurrence of percolating clusters. The benchmark model represented more features of the fluvial architecture and, depending on context, representing those features may be quite important, but the simpler geostatistical model was able to adequately represent fluvial reservoir architecture within the context and within the scope of the parameters represented here.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残余圈闭下表征CO2储层非均质性的地质统计学方法挑战
基于两点空间二元统计的地质统计学方法已被用于模拟地下水水库中污染物扩散和地质封存水库中二氧化碳捕获的计算研究中的异质性。这些方法是否有能力表示在这类水库中常见的河流构造,受到了质疑。我们挑战了广泛使用的两点空间-二元统计方法来表示河流非均质性,以表示储层非均质性如何影响为地质封存而注入的二氧化碳的剩余捕获。在这些研究中,一个更严格的河流结构模型被用作基准。对地质统计学生成的模型和基准模型进行了验证,并对高渗透优先流动路径的连通性指标进行了量化。对CO2注入进行了计算模拟,并对CO2动力学和捕集指标进行了量化。两种模型的所有指标都是相似的。高渗透率细胞在跨越连接簇(渗透簇)中的百分比相似,因为渗透强烈依赖于比例,并且在生成两种模型时指定了相同比例的高渗透率跨层。CO2羽流动力学和剩余捕获指标相似,因为它们在很大程度上受渗透簇的发生控制。基准模型代表了河流构造的更多特征,根据环境的不同,代表这些特征可能非常重要,但更简单的地质统计模型能够在环境和这里所代表的参数范围内充分代表河流储层结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Loess Is More: Field Investigation and Slope Stability Analysis of the Tanana 440 Landslide, Interior Alaska Treatment and Control of Urban Sewage with Excessive Heavy Metals for Ecological Environment Protection Site Selection for Municipal Solid Waste Landfill: Case Study of Artvin, Turkey Factors Affecting Shrinkage Crack Development in Clay Soils: An Experimental Study RAINFALL TRIGGERING OF POST-FIRE DEBRIS FLOWS OVER A 28-YEAR PERIOD NEAR EL PORTAL, CALIFORNIA, USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1