Uncharted Territories: Defense of Space in Crustacea

Melissa Hughes, Whitney L. Heuring
{"title":"Uncharted Territories: Defense of Space in Crustacea","authors":"Melissa Hughes, Whitney L. Heuring","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190620271.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Territoriality is a special case of resource defense, in which space is actively defended for exclusive use. As active defense is likely to be costly, territoriality is expected only when the benefits of exclusivity outweigh these costs. In most territorial species of noncrustacean taxa, the defended space includes resources critical for reproduction or food. These resources are not only critical for reproductive success, but also are vulnerable to “looting”, that is, the value of these resources may be reduced through short-term intrusions, even without loss of ownership, thus providing an advantage for active defense of exclusive space. Many crustaceans defend space, particularly burrows or other shelters that are refuges from predation or environmental stressors. While protection is obviously a critical resource, it is not a resource that necessarily requires exclusivity; indeed, many crustaceans that depend upon shelters for protection do not defend them for exclusive use. Nonetheless, many crustacean taxa aggressively defend exclusive access to their shelters. Crustaceans, then, may be especially suitable for testing alternative hypotheses of territoriality, including the potential benefits of interindividual spacing rather than defense of space per se. It is also worth considering a null hypothesis for territoriality: aggressive defense of space in crustaceans may be an artifact of relatively sedentary species with high intraspecific aggression favored in other contexts, rather than aggression favored for defense of particular resources. In addition to these questions, much remains to be learned about territorial behaviors in crustaceans. Most notably, the boundaries of defended space are unknown in many taxa. Understanding the boundaries of defended space is important for understanding the ecological consequences of territoriality, as well as aspects of territory acquisition and the roles of neighbor relationships and territorial advertisement signals in territory defense. Many crustacean territories appear to differ from those described for other animals, especially terrestrial species; it is not clear, however, whether these differences are due to differences in function or habitat, or rather result from our incomplete knowledge of crustacean territoriality.","PeriodicalId":387876,"journal":{"name":"Life Histories","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190620271.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Territoriality is a special case of resource defense, in which space is actively defended for exclusive use. As active defense is likely to be costly, territoriality is expected only when the benefits of exclusivity outweigh these costs. In most territorial species of noncrustacean taxa, the defended space includes resources critical for reproduction or food. These resources are not only critical for reproductive success, but also are vulnerable to “looting”, that is, the value of these resources may be reduced through short-term intrusions, even without loss of ownership, thus providing an advantage for active defense of exclusive space. Many crustaceans defend space, particularly burrows or other shelters that are refuges from predation or environmental stressors. While protection is obviously a critical resource, it is not a resource that necessarily requires exclusivity; indeed, many crustaceans that depend upon shelters for protection do not defend them for exclusive use. Nonetheless, many crustacean taxa aggressively defend exclusive access to their shelters. Crustaceans, then, may be especially suitable for testing alternative hypotheses of territoriality, including the potential benefits of interindividual spacing rather than defense of space per se. It is also worth considering a null hypothesis for territoriality: aggressive defense of space in crustaceans may be an artifact of relatively sedentary species with high intraspecific aggression favored in other contexts, rather than aggression favored for defense of particular resources. In addition to these questions, much remains to be learned about territorial behaviors in crustaceans. Most notably, the boundaries of defended space are unknown in many taxa. Understanding the boundaries of defended space is important for understanding the ecological consequences of territoriality, as well as aspects of territory acquisition and the roles of neighbor relationships and territorial advertisement signals in territory defense. Many crustacean territories appear to differ from those described for other animals, especially terrestrial species; it is not clear, however, whether these differences are due to differences in function or habitat, or rather result from our incomplete knowledge of crustacean territoriality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未知领域:甲壳类动物的空间防御
领土防卫是资源防卫的一种特殊情况,是对空间的积极防卫,以达到独占的目的。由于积极防御很可能是昂贵的,只有当独占性的好处超过这些成本时,领土才会被期待。在大多数具有领地性的非甲壳类物种中,防御空间包括繁殖或食物的关键资源。这些资源不仅对繁殖成功至关重要,而且容易被“掠夺”,即这些资源的价值可能通过短期入侵而降低,即使不失去所有权,从而为积极防御专属空间提供了优势。许多甲壳类动物保护空间,尤其是洞穴或其他避难所,以躲避捕食或环境压力。虽然保护显然是一种关键资源,但它并不一定需要排他性;事实上,许多依靠庇护所来保护的甲壳类动物并不把它们作为专有用途来保护。尽管如此,许多甲壳类动物仍然积极地捍卫自己的庇护所。因此,甲壳类动物可能特别适合用于测试关于领土的其他假设,包括个体间间隔的潜在好处,而不是空间本身的防御。同样值得考虑的是领地性的零假设:甲壳类动物对空间的侵略性防御可能是相对定居的物种的产物,它们在其他环境中具有高度的种内攻击性,而不是为了防御特定资源而具有的攻击性。除了这些问题之外,关于甲壳类动物的领土行为还有很多有待研究的地方。最值得注意的是,在许多分类群中,防御空间的边界是未知的。了解防御空间的边界对于理解领土性的生态后果,以及领土获取的各个方面以及邻居关系和领土广告信号在领土防御中的作用非常重要。许多甲壳类动物的领地似乎与其他动物,尤其是陆生物种的领地不同;然而,目前尚不清楚这些差异是由于功能或栖息地的不同,还是由于我们对甲壳类动物领土的不完全了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Body Size, Maturation Size, and Growth Rate of Crustaceans Uncharted Territories: Defense of Space in Crustacea Daphnia as a Model for Eco-evolutionary Dynamics Evolutionary Ecology of Burrow Construction and Social Life Semelparity and Iteroparity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1