Price Bargaining and Competition in Online Platforms: An Empirical Analysis of the Daily Deal Market

Mark. Sci. Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI:10.1287/MKSC.2019.1213
Lingling Zhang, Doug J. Chung
{"title":"Price Bargaining and Competition in Online Platforms: An Empirical Analysis of the Daily Deal Market","authors":"Lingling Zhang, Doug J. Chung","doi":"10.1287/MKSC.2019.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of online platforms opens new doors to traditional businesses for customer reach and revenue growth. This research investigates platform competition in a setting in which prices are determined by negotiations between platforms (specifically, their salespeople) and businesses. We compile a unique and comprehensive data set from the U.S. daily deal market, where merchants offer deals to generate revenues and attract new customers. We specify and estimate a two-stage supply-side model in which platforms and merchants bargain on the wholesale price of deals. Based on Nash bargaining solutions, our model generates insights into how bargaining power and bargaining position jointly determine price and firm profits. By working with a bigger platform, merchants enjoy a larger customer base, but they are subject to lower margins because of less bargaining power. Counterfactual results reveal that, in the absence of platform competition, merchants are worse off owing to their weaker bargaining position, but consumers experience lower prices, thus leading to an increase in total demand.","PeriodicalId":423558,"journal":{"name":"Mark. Sci.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mark. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/MKSC.2019.1213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The prevalence of online platforms opens new doors to traditional businesses for customer reach and revenue growth. This research investigates platform competition in a setting in which prices are determined by negotiations between platforms (specifically, their salespeople) and businesses. We compile a unique and comprehensive data set from the U.S. daily deal market, where merchants offer deals to generate revenues and attract new customers. We specify and estimate a two-stage supply-side model in which platforms and merchants bargain on the wholesale price of deals. Based on Nash bargaining solutions, our model generates insights into how bargaining power and bargaining position jointly determine price and firm profits. By working with a bigger platform, merchants enjoy a larger customer base, but they are subject to lower margins because of less bargaining power. Counterfactual results reveal that, in the absence of platform competition, merchants are worse off owing to their weaker bargaining position, but consumers experience lower prices, thus leading to an increase in total demand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络平台的价格议价与竞争:对团购市场的实证分析
在线平台的流行为传统企业的客户接触和收入增长打开了新的大门。本研究调查了平台竞争的设定,其中价格是由平台(特别是他们的销售人员)和企业之间的谈判决定的。我们从美国每日交易市场收集了独特而全面的数据集,商家提供交易以产生收入并吸引新客户。我们指定并估计了一个两阶段的供给侧模型,其中平台和商家在交易的批发价格上讨价还价。基于纳什议价解决方案,我们的模型产生了议价能力和议价地位如何共同决定价格和企业利润的见解。通过与更大的平台合作,商家享有更大的客户群,但由于议价能力较弱,他们的利润率较低。反事实结果表明,在没有平台竞争的情况下,由于商家的议价地位较弱,商家的情况更糟,但消费者的价格较低,从而导致总需求增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discriminatory Trade Promotions in Consumer Search Markets Rejoinder: Spilling More Beans on Political Consumerism: It's More of the Same Tune Editorial: Marketing's Role in the Evolving Discipline of Product Management Comment on "Frontiers: Spilling the Beans on Political Consumerism: Do Social Media Boycotts and Buycotts Translate to Real Sales Impact?" Frontiers: Polarized America: From Political Polarization to Preference Polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1