An individualized algorithm to predict mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia: a machine learning based study

M. Laino, E. Generali, T. Tommasini, G. Angelotti, A. Aghemo, A. Desai, Pierandrea Morandini, G. Stefanini, A. Lleo, A. Voza, V. Savevski
{"title":"An individualized algorithm to predict mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia: a machine learning based study","authors":"M. Laino, E. Generali, T. Tommasini, G. Angelotti, A. Aghemo, A. Desai, Pierandrea Morandini, G. Stefanini, A. Lleo, A. Voza, V. Savevski","doi":"10.5114/aoms/144980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Identifying SARS-CoV-2 patients at higher risk of mortality is crucial in the management of a pandemic. Artificial intelligence techniques allow one to analyze large amounts of data to find hidden patterns. We aimed to develop and validate a mortality score at admission for COVID-19 based on high-level machine learning. Material and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients between March and December 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A machine learning approach based on vital parameters, laboratory values and demographic features was applied to develop different models. Then, a feature importance analysis was performed to reduce the number of variables included in the model, to develop a risk score with good overall performance, that was finally evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration capabilities. All results underwent cross-validation. Results 1,135 consecutive patients (median age 70 years, 64% male) were enrolled, 48 patients were excluded, and the cohort was randomly divided into training (760) and test (327) groups. During hospitalization, 251 (22%) patients died. After feature selection, the best performing classifier was random forest (AUC 0.88 ±0.03). Based on the relative importance of each variable, a pragmatic score was developed, showing good performances (AUC 0.85 ±0.025), and three levels were defined that correlated well with in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Machine learning techniques were applied in order to develop an accurate in-hospital mortality risk score for COVID-19 based on ten variables. The application of the proposed score has utility in clinical settings to guide the management and prognostication of COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":190584,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science : AMS","volume":"438 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science : AMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/144980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction Identifying SARS-CoV-2 patients at higher risk of mortality is crucial in the management of a pandemic. Artificial intelligence techniques allow one to analyze large amounts of data to find hidden patterns. We aimed to develop and validate a mortality score at admission for COVID-19 based on high-level machine learning. Material and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients between March and December 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A machine learning approach based on vital parameters, laboratory values and demographic features was applied to develop different models. Then, a feature importance analysis was performed to reduce the number of variables included in the model, to develop a risk score with good overall performance, that was finally evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration capabilities. All results underwent cross-validation. Results 1,135 consecutive patients (median age 70 years, 64% male) were enrolled, 48 patients were excluded, and the cohort was randomly divided into training (760) and test (327) groups. During hospitalization, 251 (22%) patients died. After feature selection, the best performing classifier was random forest (AUC 0.88 ±0.03). Based on the relative importance of each variable, a pragmatic score was developed, showing good performances (AUC 0.85 ±0.025), and three levels were defined that correlated well with in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Machine learning techniques were applied in order to develop an accurate in-hospital mortality risk score for COVID-19 based on ten variables. The application of the proposed score has utility in clinical settings to guide the management and prognostication of COVID-19 patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测COVID-19肺炎死亡率的个性化算法:一项基于机器学习的研究
识别死亡风险较高的SARS-CoV-2患者对于大流行管理至关重要。人工智能技术允许人们分析大量数据以发现隐藏的模式。我们的目标是基于高级机器学习开发和验证COVID-19入院时的死亡率评分。材料与方法对2020年3月至12月住院的成人COVID-19患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要终点是住院死亡率。基于重要参数、实验室值和人口特征的机器学习方法被应用于开发不同的模型。然后,进行特征重要性分析,以减少模型中包含的变量数量,形成一个整体性能良好的风险评分,最后根据区分和校准能力对其进行评估。所有结果进行交叉验证。结果连续入组1135例患者(中位年龄70岁,男性64%),排除48例患者,随机分为训练组(760例)和试验组(327例)。在住院期间,251例(22%)患者死亡。经过特征选择后,表现最好的分类器为随机森林(AUC为0.88±0.03)。根据每个变量的相对重要性,制定了实用评分,表现良好(AUC为0.85±0.025),并定义了三个与住院死亡率相关的水平。结论应用机器学习技术基于10个变量建立准确的COVID-19住院死亡风险评分。该评分的应用在临床环境中具有指导COVID-19患者管理和预后的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overlap between Sjogren’s syndrome and anti-synthetase syndrome: association or coincidence? Ibrutinib attenuated DSS-induced ulcerative colitis, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory cascade by modulating the PI3K/Akt and JNK/NF-κB pathways Grisel syndrome and peripheral arthritis simultaneously occurred in a 7-year-old Chinese boy with Kawasaki disease Application of three-dimensional printing technology for spinal tuberculosis Two complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: lupus cystitis and lupus enteritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1