An evaluation of k-nearest neighbour imputation using Likert data

Per Jönsson, C. Wohlin
{"title":"An evaluation of k-nearest neighbour imputation using Likert data","authors":"Per Jönsson, C. Wohlin","doi":"10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies in many different fields of research suffer from the problem of missing data. With missing data, statistical tests will lose power, results may be biased, or analysis may not be feasible at all. There are several ways to handle the problem, for example through imputation. With imputation, missing values are replaced with estimated values according to an imputation method or model. In the k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) method, a case is imputed using values from the k most similar cases. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the k-NN method using Likert data in a software engineering context. We simulate the method with different values of k and for different percentages of missing data. Our findings indicate that it is feasible to use the k-NN method with Likert data. We suggest that a suitable value of k is approximately the square root of the number of complete cases. We also show that by relaxing the method rules with respect to selecting neighbours, the ability of the method remains high for large amounts of missing data without affecting the quality of the imputation.","PeriodicalId":261807,"journal":{"name":"10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"162","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 162

Abstract

Studies in many different fields of research suffer from the problem of missing data. With missing data, statistical tests will lose power, results may be biased, or analysis may not be feasible at all. There are several ways to handle the problem, for example through imputation. With imputation, missing values are replaced with estimated values according to an imputation method or model. In the k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) method, a case is imputed using values from the k most similar cases. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the k-NN method using Likert data in a software engineering context. We simulate the method with different values of k and for different percentages of missing data. Our findings indicate that it is feasible to use the k-NN method with Likert data. We suggest that a suitable value of k is approximately the square root of the number of complete cases. We also show that by relaxing the method rules with respect to selecting neighbours, the ability of the method remains high for large amounts of missing data without affecting the quality of the imputation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用李克特数据的k近邻估算
许多不同领域的研究都存在数据缺失的问题。由于缺少数据,统计检验将失去效力,结果可能有偏差,或者分析可能根本不可行。有几种方法可以处理这个问题,例如通过imputation。通过估算,根据估算方法或模型将缺失值替换为估计值。在k近邻(k- nn)方法中,使用k个最相似案例的值来估算一个案例。在本文中,我们在软件工程环境中使用Likert数据对k-NN方法进行了评估。我们用不同的k值和不同的缺失数据百分比来模拟该方法。我们的研究结果表明,将k-NN方法用于李克特数据是可行的。我们建议一个合适的k值近似于完全情况数的平方根。我们还表明,通过放宽选择邻居的方法规则,该方法在大量缺失数据的情况下仍然具有很高的能力,而不会影响插值的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The necessity of assuring quality in software measurement data Resource estimation for Web applications A survey on software estimation in the Norwegian industry A controlled experiment for evaluating a metric-based reading technique for requirements inspection Assessing usability through perceptions of information scent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1