{"title":"Anti-Chinese Racism at Berkeley: The Case for Renaming Boalt Hall","authors":"Charles Reichmann","doi":"10.15779/Z38FX73Z11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Those familiar with UC Berkeley School of Law know its traditional name and the name of its primary classroom building - Boalt Hall. Yet few know much about the man who gave the law school its name. A close look at John Boalt’s legacy, however, calls out for a reexamination of the law school’s continued association with Boalt, given the contrast between UC Berkeley’s stated values and Boalt’s influential views that the Chinese were an unassimilable race that ought to be excluded from the United States. Boalt's racial theories were identical to John C. Calhoun's, whose name Yale University recently removed from a residential college on the grounds that Calhoun's principles and legacy are at odds with Yale's mission and values. Through his widely-circulated and virulently racist 1877 address \"The Chinese Question\" and his proposal for a plebiscite on further immigration, Boalt was instrumental in catalyzing support for the Chinese Exclusion Act.","PeriodicalId":334951,"journal":{"name":"Asian American Law Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian American Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38FX73Z11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Those familiar with UC Berkeley School of Law know its traditional name and the name of its primary classroom building - Boalt Hall. Yet few know much about the man who gave the law school its name. A close look at John Boalt’s legacy, however, calls out for a reexamination of the law school’s continued association with Boalt, given the contrast between UC Berkeley’s stated values and Boalt’s influential views that the Chinese were an unassimilable race that ought to be excluded from the United States. Boalt's racial theories were identical to John C. Calhoun's, whose name Yale University recently removed from a residential college on the grounds that Calhoun's principles and legacy are at odds with Yale's mission and values. Through his widely-circulated and virulently racist 1877 address "The Chinese Question" and his proposal for a plebiscite on further immigration, Boalt was instrumental in catalyzing support for the Chinese Exclusion Act.
熟悉加州大学伯克利分校法学院的人都知道它的传统名字和它的主要教学楼的名字——鲍尔特大厅。然而,很少有人了解这位为法学院命名的人。然而,仔细观察约翰·鲍尔特的遗产,我们需要重新审视法学院与鲍尔特的持续联系,因为加州大学伯克利分校所陈述的价值观与鲍尔特有影响力的观点之间的对比,后者认为中国人是一个不可同化的种族,应该被排除在美国之外。鲍尔特的种族理论与约翰·c·卡尔霍恩(John C. Calhoun)的相同,耶鲁大学最近从一所住宿学院撤掉了卡尔霍恩的名字,理由是卡尔霍恩的原则和遗产与耶鲁的使命和价值观不符。通过他在1877年广为流传的带有强烈种族主义色彩的演讲“华人问题”,以及他提议就进一步移民问题举行公民投票,鲍尔特在促进对《排华法案》的支持方面发挥了重要作用。