The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation

O. Doroshenko, L. Tarasenko
{"title":"The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation","authors":"O. Doroshenko, L. Tarasenko","doi":"10.33731/32023.282325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers novel legal regulations regarding non-original objects generated by a computer program. It was established that at the level of the law, legal certainty was introduced regarding the legal regime of these objects: the concept and characteristics of a non-original object, generated by a computer program, subjects of property rights, the scope of such rights, their validity period, the possibility of transfer (alienation) were defined) of these rights, as well as an opportunity to properly protect such rights. The signs of a non-original object generated by a computer program are defined: difference from already existing similar objects; creation of an object solely as a result of the operation of a computer program without direct human participation. It has been proven that the independent legal personality of artificial intelligence is highly debatable, and this concept goes far beyond the boundaries of intellectual property law. It is justified that giving artificial intelligence an independent legal personality as of today is a hasty step, therefore the approach reflected in the law deserves attention.It is substantiated that the legal regime of an object that is non-original and that is generated by a computer program is very similar to the legal regime of a work as an object of copyright, which enables the relevant subjects to exercise and protect the rights to these objects. It was established that as a result of the creation of a non-original object generated by a computer program, personal non-property rights do not arise at all, and property rights belong to the owner of the property rights to the computer program that generated such an object. It has been proven that the property rights to a nonoriginal object are in fact identical to the property rights of the author (other subjects of property copyright), the scope of which is determined by Article 12 of the Copyright Law.It is established that when creating a non-original object generated by a computer program, one should observe the property rights to other non-original objects generated by a computer program, which are used in the process of generating a new non-original object; to objects of copyright and/or related rights that were used in the process of generating such non-original object.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"363 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/32023.282325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article considers novel legal regulations regarding non-original objects generated by a computer program. It was established that at the level of the law, legal certainty was introduced regarding the legal regime of these objects: the concept and characteristics of a non-original object, generated by a computer program, subjects of property rights, the scope of such rights, their validity period, the possibility of transfer (alienation) were defined) of these rights, as well as an opportunity to properly protect such rights. The signs of a non-original object generated by a computer program are defined: difference from already existing similar objects; creation of an object solely as a result of the operation of a computer program without direct human participation. It has been proven that the independent legal personality of artificial intelligence is highly debatable, and this concept goes far beyond the boundaries of intellectual property law. It is justified that giving artificial intelligence an independent legal personality as of today is a hasty step, therefore the approach reflected in the law deserves attention.It is substantiated that the legal regime of an object that is non-original and that is generated by a computer program is very similar to the legal regime of a work as an object of copyright, which enables the relevant subjects to exercise and protect the rights to these objects. It was established that as a result of the creation of a non-original object generated by a computer program, personal non-property rights do not arise at all, and property rights belong to the owner of the property rights to the computer program that generated such an object. It has been proven that the property rights to a nonoriginal object are in fact identical to the property rights of the author (other subjects of property copyright), the scope of which is determined by Article 12 of the Copyright Law.It is established that when creating a non-original object generated by a computer program, one should observe the property rights to other non-original objects generated by a computer program, which are used in the process of generating a new non-original object; to objects of copyright and/or related rights that were used in the process of generating such non-original object.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对计算机程序产生的非原创物品的特殊权利:法律规定的新奇之处
本文考虑了有关计算机程序生成的非原物的新法律规定。在法律层面,对这些客体的法律制度引入了法律确定性:由计算机程序产生的非原创性客体的概念和特征、产权的主体、这些权利的范围、有效期限、这些权利的转让(转让)可能性,以及适当保护这些权利的机会。由计算机程序生成的非原始物体的标志定义为:与已经存在的类似物体不同;完全由计算机程序操作而不需要人类直接参与而产生的对象。事实证明,人工智能的独立法人资格争议很大,这一概念远远超出了知识产权法的界限。在今天赋予人工智能独立的法律人格是有道理的,因此法律中反映的做法值得关注。事实证明,由计算机程序产生的非原创性客体的法律制度与作为版权客体的作品的法律制度非常相似,使相关主体能够行使和保护这些客体的权利。确立了由计算机程序产生的非原创性客体的创造结果,根本不产生个人非产权,产权属于产生该客体的计算机程序的产权所有人。事实证明,非原创物的财产权实际上与作者的财产权(其他财产著作权主体)相同,其范围由《著作权法》第十二条规定。确立了在创作由计算机程序生成的非原创物品时,应当注意在生成新的非原创物品过程中所使用的由计算机程序生成的其他非原创物品的产权;版权和/或相关权利的对象,在生成该非原创对象的过程中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accelerated examination of patent applications for «green» technologies: foreign experience for Ukraine Draft Regulation of the European Union about artificial intelligence and related initiatives Intellectual property rights in the context of biology, medicine and pharmacy: a look into the future The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation ABUSE OF PATENTABILITY CRITERIA WHEN PATENTING INVENTIONS RELATED TO MEDICINES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1