Examining interdependence between product users and employees in online user communities: The role of employee-generated content

IF 8.7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Strategic Information Systems Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101657
Jie (Kevin) Yan , Dorothy E. Leidner , Hind Benbya , Weifei Zou
{"title":"Examining interdependence between product users and employees in online user communities: The role of employee-generated content","authors":"Jie (Kevin) Yan ,&nbsp;Dorothy E. Leidner ,&nbsp;Hind Benbya ,&nbsp;Weifei Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Firm-sponsored online user communities have become product innovation and support hubs of strategic importance to firms. Product users and host firm employees comprise the participants of firm-sponsored online user communities. The online user community provides a forum wherein the product users and firm employees discuss questions, problems or issues resulting from the use of host firms’ products. Extant research on online user communities has largely focused on either product users or employees and has examined the various dynamics that ensue from each entity’s community participation. This paper seeks to investigate the interdependence between the two entities in the communities and, in particular, how product users’ reading of employee-generated content influences subsequent knowledge contribution by product users as well as employees. Analyzing data from an online user community over a two-year period, our study shows that employees whose content is read by product users generate additional content and product users who read employee content themselves contribute more knowledge to the community. Thus, the reading of content is not entirely a passive, individual action that only affects the reader. On the contrary, reading sparks additional knowledge contribution by the reader and having readers sparks additional knowledge contribution by the original source of the content, thereby creating a sustainable online user community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"30 1","pages":"Article 101657"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101657","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Firm-sponsored online user communities have become product innovation and support hubs of strategic importance to firms. Product users and host firm employees comprise the participants of firm-sponsored online user communities. The online user community provides a forum wherein the product users and firm employees discuss questions, problems or issues resulting from the use of host firms’ products. Extant research on online user communities has largely focused on either product users or employees and has examined the various dynamics that ensue from each entity’s community participation. This paper seeks to investigate the interdependence between the two entities in the communities and, in particular, how product users’ reading of employee-generated content influences subsequent knowledge contribution by product users as well as employees. Analyzing data from an online user community over a two-year period, our study shows that employees whose content is read by product users generate additional content and product users who read employee content themselves contribute more knowledge to the community. Thus, the reading of content is not entirely a passive, individual action that only affects the reader. On the contrary, reading sparks additional knowledge contribution by the reader and having readers sparks additional knowledge contribution by the original source of the content, thereby creating a sustainable online user community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查在线用户社区中产品用户和员工之间的相互依赖关系:员工生成内容的角色
企业赞助的在线用户社区已经成为对企业具有战略重要性的产品创新和支持中心。产品用户和主机公司员工组成了公司赞助的在线用户社区的参与者。在线用户社区提供了一个论坛,产品用户和公司员工在其中讨论因使用东道国公司的产品而产生的问题、问题或问题。现有的关于在线用户社区的研究主要集中在产品用户或员工身上,并研究了每个实体的社区参与所产生的各种动态。本文旨在调查社区中两个实体之间的相互依存关系,特别是产品用户对员工生成内容的阅读如何影响产品用户和员工随后的知识贡献。通过分析一个在线用户社区两年的数据,我们的研究表明,产品用户阅读的员工内容会产生额外的内容,而阅读员工内容的产品用户自己也会为社区贡献更多的知识。因此,阅读内容并不完全是一种被动的、只影响读者的个人行为。相反,阅读会激发读者额外的知识贡献,而拥有读者会激发内容的原始来源额外的知识贡献,从而创造一个可持续的在线用户社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Journal of Strategic Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems focuses on the strategic management, business and organizational issues associated with the introduction and utilization of information systems, and considers these issues in a global context. The emphasis is on the incorporation of IT into organizations'' strategic thinking, strategy alignment, organizational arrangements and management of change issues.
期刊最新文献
Do CEOs matter? Divergent impact of CEO power on digital and non-digital innovation A knowledge-centric model for government-orchestrated digital transformation among the microbusiness sector A process model for design-oriented machine learning research in information systems Is AI a strategic IS? Reflections and opportunities for research A socio-cognitive perspective of knowledge integration in digital innovation networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1