Baserer de såkaldte Bartholinannaler sig på danske middelalderlige årbøger?

Svend Clausen
{"title":"Baserer de såkaldte Bartholinannaler sig på danske middelalderlige årbøger?","authors":"Svend Clausen","doi":"10.7146/fof.v60i.130494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Svend Clausen: Are the Annales Bartholiniani based on Danish medievalannals? \nThe article discusses the so-called Annales Bartholiniani, written by the Danish scholarThomas Bartholin (1659‑1690). Analysis of a series of events that are clearly dated incorrectlyin the Annales Bartholiniani and a comparison of the dating of these eventswith the content of Danish medieval annals suggest that the inaccurate dating of suchevents in the Annales Bartholiniani must go back to the Danish medieval annalistictraditions. This proves that a great deal of the content of the Annales Bartholinianimust go back either directly or indirectly to the content of Danish medieval annals. Italso points to the fact that there needs to be more discussion of the Annales Bartholinianiin future studies, as they also contain a great deal of information not availableelsewhere, and the close link between them and the content of Danish medieval annalsmakes it much more likely that Bartholin may have used also some Danish medievalannals now lost in addition to the medieval annals still known to us. In this respect,such an identified close link between the Annales Bartholiniani and the known contentof the Danish medieval annalistic traditions may help significantly in explaining alsosome of the otherwise unknown information present in the Annales Bartholiniani.Discussions of the content for years such as 1087 and 1142, for example, suggest thatspecific details such as these may go back directly or indirectly to a now lost medievalDanish annalistic tradition.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v60i.130494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Svend Clausen: Are the Annales Bartholiniani based on Danish medievalannals? The article discusses the so-called Annales Bartholiniani, written by the Danish scholarThomas Bartholin (1659‑1690). Analysis of a series of events that are clearly dated incorrectlyin the Annales Bartholiniani and a comparison of the dating of these eventswith the content of Danish medieval annals suggest that the inaccurate dating of suchevents in the Annales Bartholiniani must go back to the Danish medieval annalistictraditions. This proves that a great deal of the content of the Annales Bartholinianimust go back either directly or indirectly to the content of Danish medieval annals. Italso points to the fact that there needs to be more discussion of the Annales Bartholinianiin future studies, as they also contain a great deal of information not availableelsewhere, and the close link between them and the content of Danish medieval annalsmakes it much more likely that Bartholin may have used also some Danish medievalannals now lost in addition to the medieval annals still known to us. In this respect,such an identified close link between the Annales Bartholiniani and the known contentof the Danish medieval annalistic traditions may help significantly in explaining alsosome of the otherwise unknown information present in the Annales Bartholiniani.Discussions of the content for years such as 1087 and 1142, for example, suggest thatspecific details such as these may go back directly or indirectly to a now lost medievalDanish annalistic tradition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
send Clausen:《巴塞利尼年历》是基于丹麦中世纪的编年史吗?这篇文章讨论了丹麦学者托马斯·巴托林(thomas Bartholin, 1659 - 1690)所写的所谓的《巴托利尼亚尼年历》。对《巴托利尼亚尼年历》中一系列明显年代错误的事件进行分析,并将这些事件的年代与丹麦中世纪编年史的内容进行比较,表明《巴托利尼亚尼年历》中这些事件的年代不准确肯定要追溯到丹麦中世纪编年史的传统。这证明了《巴托利尼年鉴》的大量内容必须直接或间接地追溯到丹麦中世纪编年史的内容。它还指出,在未来的研究中,需要对《巴托林年历》进行更多的讨论,因为它们也包含了大量其他地方无法获得的信息,而且它们与丹麦中世纪年历的内容之间的密切联系使得巴托林更有可能也使用了一些现在已经丢失的丹麦中世纪年历,除了我们仍然知道的中世纪年历之外。在这方面,《巴托利尼亚尼年历》与丹麦中世纪年历传统的已知内容之间的这种确定的密切联系可能有助于解释《巴托利尼亚尼年历》中存在的一些其他未知信息。例如,对1087年和1142年等年份内容的讨论表明,诸如此类的具体细节可能直接或间接地追溯到现已失传的中世纪丹麦编年史传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ingeniøren og de ægyptiske mumier: En kioskbasker fra 1910’erne En engelsk bogskat i Det Kgl. Bibliotek, Aarhus “Vi har tæmmet Rejselystens ubændige Tiger for en Stund” Skibe på et hav af manuskripter: om Håndskriftsamlingens skibe Kamante og Lulu i Amerika
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1