Two World Views? How Regular and Reserve Royal Marines Perceive Each Other

E. Wilkinson, E. Kutsch, E. Parry, N. Turner
{"title":"Two World Views? How Regular and Reserve Royal Marines Perceive Each Other","authors":"E. Wilkinson, E. Kutsch, E. Parry, N. Turner","doi":"10.1177/0095327x231176064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective integration of the Regular and Reserve Armed Forces is essential to operational effectiveness, but evidence suggests that this remains problematic. Past research has focused on the professional values of Regulars and the perceptions that this group holds about Reservists. In this study, we argue that it is necessary to consider the perceptions of both Regulars and Reservists to truly understand the barriers to integration between these elements of Defence. This study investigates what Regular and Reserve Royal Marines see as the important constructs related to each group, through the use of repertory grid technique with 18 Regulars and 16 Reservists. Not only did the Regulars and Reservists in this study see different constructs as important, they also ascribed different constructs to each group. These differences are potentially problematic when aiming to integrate the Regular and Reserve Armed Forces.","PeriodicalId":130147,"journal":{"name":"Armed Forces & Society","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Armed Forces & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x231176064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective integration of the Regular and Reserve Armed Forces is essential to operational effectiveness, but evidence suggests that this remains problematic. Past research has focused on the professional values of Regulars and the perceptions that this group holds about Reservists. In this study, we argue that it is necessary to consider the perceptions of both Regulars and Reservists to truly understand the barriers to integration between these elements of Defence. This study investigates what Regular and Reserve Royal Marines see as the important constructs related to each group, through the use of repertory grid technique with 18 Regulars and 16 Reservists. Not only did the Regulars and Reservists in this study see different constructs as important, they also ascribed different constructs to each group. These differences are potentially problematic when aiming to integrate the Regular and Reserve Armed Forces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种世界观?皇家海军陆战队和预备役海军陆战队是如何看待彼此的
正规武装部队和预备役武装部队的有效整合对作战效能至关重要,但有证据表明,这仍然存在问题。过去的研究主要集中在普通军人的职业价值观和这个群体对预备役军人的看法上。在本研究中,我们认为有必要考虑现役军人和预备役军人的看法,以真正理解这些国防要素之间整合的障碍。本研究通过对18名正规军和16名预备役士兵使用储备网格技术,调查了皇家海军陆战队正规军和预备役海军陆战队认为与每个群体相关的重要构念。在这项研究中,不仅现役军人和预备役军人认为不同的构念是重要的,而且他们还将不同的构念归因于每一组。这些差异在整合正规军和预备役部队时可能会产生问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors for Homelessness Among Post-9/11 Era Veterans Captain Mayor and Sergeant Councilman? An Assessment of the Reach of Military Politicization in Brazilian Politics The Science of Charles C. Moskos: From Institution to Occupation How Does Military Experience Affect Employment: Evidence From China Partners in Love/War: An Explorative Study of Ukrainian Soldiers’ Lived Experiences of Being in a Romantic Relationship in the Russo-Ukrainian War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1