EFFICACY OF DRY NEEDLING TECHNIQUE VERSUS CERVICAL MANIPULATION TECHNIQUE ON PATIENTS WITH MIGRAINE

Jibi Paul, D. C. Kousalya
{"title":"EFFICACY OF DRY NEEDLING TECHNIQUE VERSUS CERVICAL MANIPULATION TECHNIQUE ON PATIENTS WITH MIGRAINE","authors":"Jibi Paul, D. C. Kousalya","doi":"10.36678/ijmaes.2022.v08i03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of the study: Migraine is serious health problem in 15% of general population. The patients with migraine exhibited active Trigger Points in their neck extensor muscles. Dry needling is a treatment using a thin filament sterile needle to puncture skin and create tiny lesions in a muscle, tendon, to help restore normal physiology function, and reduce pain. Needling has applications for myofascial pain, chronic pain, headache, migraine. Cervical Manipulation Technique has been used to reduce pain and improve range of motion and used in the treatment of patients with head and neck disorders, including neck pain and stiffness, muscle-tension headache, and migraine. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of dry needling technique versus cervical manipulation technique on patients with migraine. Methodology: 30 patients were randomly divided into two groups; fifteen patients in the experimental group-A received cervical manipulation technique (3 times/week) and fifteen patients in the experimental group-B received Dry needling technique. The VAS and NDI were used as outcome measures. Result: Comparing between Group A and Group B showed significant difference in effectiveness on pain and Neck disability with P value >0.0001 among patients with migraine. Group B with Dry needling technique found more effective than Group A with cervical manipulation technique with mean difference of (2.867) and (11.40) over (2.267) and (10.47) respectively. Conclusion: Dry needling technique group is more effective over cervical manipulation technique on enhancing on pain and neck disability. Therefore, this study concludes that Dry needling technique is an effective intervention for migraine patients.","PeriodicalId":275373,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Exercise Science","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36678/ijmaes.2022.v08i03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background of the study: Migraine is serious health problem in 15% of general population. The patients with migraine exhibited active Trigger Points in their neck extensor muscles. Dry needling is a treatment using a thin filament sterile needle to puncture skin and create tiny lesions in a muscle, tendon, to help restore normal physiology function, and reduce pain. Needling has applications for myofascial pain, chronic pain, headache, migraine. Cervical Manipulation Technique has been used to reduce pain and improve range of motion and used in the treatment of patients with head and neck disorders, including neck pain and stiffness, muscle-tension headache, and migraine. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of dry needling technique versus cervical manipulation technique on patients with migraine. Methodology: 30 patients were randomly divided into two groups; fifteen patients in the experimental group-A received cervical manipulation technique (3 times/week) and fifteen patients in the experimental group-B received Dry needling technique. The VAS and NDI were used as outcome measures. Result: Comparing between Group A and Group B showed significant difference in effectiveness on pain and Neck disability with P value >0.0001 among patients with migraine. Group B with Dry needling technique found more effective than Group A with cervical manipulation technique with mean difference of (2.867) and (11.40) over (2.267) and (10.47) respectively. Conclusion: Dry needling technique group is more effective over cervical manipulation technique on enhancing on pain and neck disability. Therefore, this study concludes that Dry needling technique is an effective intervention for migraine patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干针手法与颈椎手法治疗偏头痛的疗效比较
研究背景:偏头痛是严重的健康问题,约占总人口的15%。偏头痛患者在颈部伸肌中表现出活跃的触发点。干针是一种使用细丝无菌针刺穿皮肤并在肌肉、肌腱上造成微小损伤的治疗方法,以帮助恢复正常的生理功能并减轻疼痛。针刺对肌筋膜疼痛、慢性疼痛、头痛、偏头痛都有应用。颈椎推拿技术已被用于减轻疼痛和改善活动范围,并用于治疗头颈部疾病患者,包括颈部疼痛和僵硬、肌肉紧张性头痛和偏头痛。本研究的目的是比较干针手法与颈椎手法对偏头痛患者的疗效。方法:30例患者随机分为两组;实验a组15例患者采用颈椎推拿手法(3次/周),实验b组15例患者采用干针手法。VAS和NDI作为结局指标。结果:A组与B组对偏头痛患者疼痛和颈部残疾的疗效比较,P值>0.0001,差异有统计学意义。干针法治疗组疗效优于推拿法治疗组,平均差值分别为(2.867)、(11.40)、(2.267)、(10.47)。结论:干针手法组在改善颈部疼痛和功能障碍方面优于颈椎手法组。因此,本研究认为干针技术是偏头痛患者的有效干预手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Awareness and Perception on Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy for Covid-19 Patients among the Alumni Physiotherapists from KPJ Healthcare University College, Nilai A MODEL OF ISLAMIC SPIRITUALITY: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRESSIVE RESISTED EXERCISE, PROPRIOCEPTION TRAINING AND RHYTHMIC EXERCISES TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG DIABETIC NEUROPATHY EFFICACY OF DRY NEEDLING TECHNIQUE VERSUS CERVICAL MANIPULATION TECHNIQUE ON PATIENTS WITH MIGRAINE EFFECTIVENESS OF POST ISOMETRIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUE OVER POST FACILITATION STRETCHING TECHNIQUE FOR PATIENT WITH TRAPEZITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1